The Oaths taken at Baptism
Most of us in the west were taken to the Church as a baby when the priest or
minister poured water on us to make us Christians as he said, “I baptise you in
the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit”. It is assumed
that these words must be said on the authority of Matthew 28:19 which only has
Jesus saying baptise my disciples in the name of the Father Son and Holy Spirit
which gives no indication that these words are to be said or even that baptism
can be given only the once!
The Roman Catholic Church claims that sprinkling water on a baby or an adult
while saying, "I baptise you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the
Holy Spirit" does amazing things. It takes away the sin we are born with,
original sin, and any other sins and grafts us on to Jesus making us his
servants. It puts Jesus and God inside us to live in us and inspire us. The
Church says that baptism heals the inclination towards sin that original sin
causes. Baptism is a sacrament. It pictures cleansing from sin and the effects
of sin and actually does what it pictures.
The Church claims that when you were baptised as a baby you were made a member
of the Church and obligated to obey its Bible and its God and its popes for all
eternity. This claim is very vindictive. If there is indeed an obligation, the
Church has to hope that you will suffer if you fail to keep it.
Obligations mean things you have to do on pain of being condemned as an immoral
person worthy of suffering punishment. Any obligation with no punishment is not
an obligation at all. Religion cannot prove religious obligations to be real.
You need proof before you have the right to make obligations for people.
The Church claims it is not vindictive but wants those who do not do their
duties to repent. But that is admitting that it is vindictive towards those who
do not repent. Oh the hypocrisy! And inventing more obligations than is
necessary is intrinsically vindictive.
It is far more vindictive to say people should be punished for breaking the vows
made for them to be faithful to the Church than it is to say they should be
punished for vows they made themselves as adults. Parents need to ponder this
stuff before considering getting their babies baptised.
Baptism needs to be declared null and void and incapable of conferring fair and
just obligations. Annulling is not an option. It's an obligation.
The rite of baptism is the secret of the Church’s power for it is taboo not to
have your child baptised and it gives the Church an excuse for indoctrinating
the child. Vows are taken at baptism on behalf of the child. The child is
believed to confirm these vows by affiliating with the Church when he or she
gains the age of reason. The ceremonial reaffirmation of these vows takes place
during confirmation. Confirmation confirms the vows. The vows in the Roman
Catholic cult take the form of renouncing Satan and all his works and an
affirmation of faith similar to the Apostles’ Creed. They say they believe in
God and in his Son Jesus Christ and in the Holy Spirit and the Holy Catholic
Church. In other words, they are vowing to obey the Church God and Jesus
founded. You don’t say by, “I believe in the Holy Catholic Church”, that you
mean you believe that an organisation exists. You believe in more than that, you
mean you believe in and trust in the Church of God and its authority. In the
case of a homosexual for example, he cannot say that he has the right to
practice homosexuality and call himself a good Catholic for the Church denounces
homosexuality and he took vows to support the Church teaching at baptism and
confirmation. These are vows that the Church says it cannot absolve anybody
from keeping. A religious might get her or his vows dispensed by the Church but
these baptismal vows are permanently binding and irrevocable. This Catholic
homosexual cannot say that it is none of the Church’s business what he does for
he vowed to abstain implicitly from anything banned by the Church. He lied to
the Church by practicing homosexuality so it’s the business not just of the
authorities of the Church but the people as well. By taking baptism it is
evident that you are making vows of some sort. The baptismal vows just express
what it means to be baptised and how being baptised means you are going to live
your life. That is why if the vows were dropped no difference would be made for
in the Catholic understanding of baptism you are becoming a member of the Church
and for the Church to run it needs to be ordered by authority in the pope and
the bishops. A chaotic Church is not a Church. Baptism is a plot then for
getting people controlled by the Church. It may not work much these days but
that is what it is for. It is entering the jurisdiction of the pope and the
bishops in the Catholic Church and submitting to their authority for life.
Baptism leads to more evil than good for everybody breaks the baptismal vows and
it leads to a general lack of respect for vows. The priest who wants to stray
knows that his baptismal vows are his most important vows and he broke them many
times and enjoyed it. He will not care then if he meets a woman he would like to
break his vow of celibacy with. This vow has to do with celibacy, not getting
married, not chastity. It is hard to see how a vow that forbids something
supposedly good like marriage could be taken seriously. Vows only make people
worse not better for the man who vows to be chaste and then has sex is worse
than the man who made no vow and was unchaste.
WORKS CONSULTED
12 Church of Christ Doctrines Compared with the Holy Scriptures, Homer Duncan,
Missionary Crusader, Texas, 1984
All One Body – Why Don’t We Agree? Erwin W Lutzer, Tyndale, Illinois, 1989
Baptism, Meaning, Mode & Subjects, Michael Kimmitt, K & M Books, Trelawnyd, 1997
But the Bible Does not Say So, Rev Roberto Nisbet, Church Book Room Press,
London, 1966
But What About the Thief on the Cross? Cecil Willis, Guardian of Truth, Bowling
Green, Kentucky
Christian Baptism, Philip Crowe, Mobray, Oxford, 1980
Covenant Reformed News, Volume 7, Number 13, Ballymena, Northern Ireland
Four Great Heresies, John R Rice, Sword of the Lord, Murfreesboro, 1975
Handbook to the Controversy with Rome, Vol 1, Karl Von Hase, The Religious Tract
Society, 4 Bouverie Street, 1906
Is it necessary for you to be baptised to be saved? Hoyt H Houchen, Guardian of
Truth, Bowling Green, Kentucky
Is Water Baptism Essential to Salvation? Curtis Hutson, Sword of the Lord, 1988
Jesus and the Four Gospels, John Drane, Lion, Herts, 1984
Objections to Roman Catholicism, Edited by Michael de la Bedoyere, Constable,
London, 1964
Radio Replies, Vol 3, Frs Rumble and Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul,
Minnesota 1942
Reason and Belief, Bland Blanschard, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London, 1974
Regeneration or the New Birth, A W Pink, Evangelical Press, Welwyn, Herts,
England, undated
The Documents of Vatican II, Edited by Walter M Abbott SJ, Geoffrey Chapman Ltd,
London, 1967
The Institutes of the Christian Religion, John Calvin, Hodder and Stoughton,
London, 1986
The Only Way of Salvation, H. A. Twelves, Christadelphian ALS, Birmingham
Vicars of Christ, Peter de Rosa, Corgi, London, 1993
When Critics Ask, Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, Victor Books, Scripture Press
Publications, Illinois, 1992
Why Baptism Really Matters, Fred Pearce, Christadelphian Publishing Office,
Birmingham
Why Does God? Domenico Grasso SJ, St Paul Publications, Bucks, England, 1970
Why you Should be Baptized, Herbert W Armstrong, Worldwide Church of God,
Pasadena, California, 1991
The WWW
Doctrinal Summary by Br Thomas Mary MICM. This page informs us that Catholic
teaching is that if you hear of the Catholic Church and don’t join it or study
it your damnation is guaranteed. It affirms that babies that die without baptism
will be banned from Heaven forever.
BIBLE QUOTATIONS FROM:
The Amplified Bible