PROTESTANT DOCTRINE OF PRIVATE BIBLE INTERPRETATION EXAMINED
Roman Catholicism teaches that scripture must be read in the light of Church
teaching. Protestantism teaches you must decide for yourself what scripture is
teaching. Protestantism takes this stance because it holds that the Bible alone
has authority in religion. It denies the Catholic claim that the Church is
infallible and has authority equal to the Bible.
Instead of the Bible being interpreted for you by the pope and his cronies, the
Protestant faith believes that you have to read it and interpret it yourself in
the light of divine guidance. If the Bible is the only authority in faith and
morals like that faith asserts then it follows that every person has a duty to
go straight to the book to learn about God and his will and to take nobody
else’s word for anything. Protestantism uses scholars to understand the Bible
but they say this is not a denial of private interpretation. God helps people
understand his word and one can benefit from what God tells other people. If you
agree with them, you are simply making their interpretation your own and it is
still private interpretation.
It is more rational to do what Protestantism does and take the scholars into
account instead of just letting the pope and the Roman curia tell you what to
think about the Bible as if they were infallible psychics.
If the Bible is the only authority then each person is to read it for themselves
for it says it can be understood by anyone with the help of the Holy Spirit (2
Timothy 3:16, 17). To listen to another interpreter instead of studying it on
your own would be making that person the supreme authority – which is also
disobedient to God who warns that we must be careful for there are so many
wolves in sheepskins about (Matthew 7:15).
The Bible itself says that certain portions of it are difficult to understand
and have led some astray. 2 Peter 3:16 says this of Paul’s letters though Paul
would have regarded this as unfair (2 Corinthians 1:13). (By the way, Ephesians
3:1-5 doesn’t say that all the apostles and the prophets wrote could be
understood but only that the mystery of Christ they declare would be
understood.) But if God’s revelation is hard to understand then it is hardly a
revelation is it? A book that is not clear even in part is not the word of God.
God says that he wants the Church to be one in agreement (1 Corinthians 1:10) so
that means there is only one revelation but the Bible says several times that it
is not difficult to understand. Matthew 15:8,9 says that our human opinions can
make God reject us which tells us that the Bible must interpret itself and that
is how we can understand it for to introduce foreign interpretation is adding to
it.
Catholics argue that the obscurity of portions of the Bible and Peter’s
declaration that no prophecy is a matter of one’s own interpretation (2 Peter
1:19-21) prove that the Protestant doctrine of private interpretation, that each
person is to interpret the Bible on their own, is false. Catholics say, “The
mysterious and vague nature of the Bible makes it require an infallible
interpreter, the bishops and the pope, and such is needed when the Bible forbids
private interpretation”. See Question 114, Radio Replies, Vol 1).
Protestants retort that they do not believe that one has the right to interpret
scripture any way they wish. One must read everything in context and in the
light of what the rest of scripture teaches and be open to the guidance of the
Holy Spirit. Private interpretation means learning from God what the Bible
means. God has the power to tell you what an obscure passage means. If you
misunderstand or have a different interpretation from somebody else that is your
resistance to the Holy Spirit so it is humanity that causes divisions and not
God. If the Catholics are honest, even if the Church is the authorised
interpreter, the Church has changed many of the old interpretations because of
new discoveries and new evidence which would indicate that the Church has no
more power to understand the Bible than anybody else has. This would indicate
that the Bible is not inspired at all when it can be obscure and confusing and
when you need to be very clever to prove to yourself that it never contradicts
itself and fits archaeology. You have to make sure that the book is the word of
God before you have the right to believe in it for God said that he comes first
and that he himself is the meaning of life.
The sects which disagree on the interpretation of the Bible can be said to be
guilty of resisting the Holy Spirit. The schisms and arguments would not
disprove private interpretation for people are reluctant to submit to God. The
Catholic Church believes that God speaks to you and guides you directly when you
read the Bible with a holy and open heart as much as Protestants do. The only
difference is that the Catholic is to ignore the guidance if it conflicts with
the pope and Protestants ignore it if it contradicts the Bible and commonsense
(the latter to a small extent). There is much disagreement in the Catholic
Church over Bible interpretation and it is so unfair that it condemns other
religions for doing what it does itself and says it disproves private
interpretation. If it disproves it and Protestantism then it disproves it in
Roman Catholicism and Roman Catholicism too.
Since sinners can’t do real good for Jesus said bad fruit comes from bad trees.
The good work of a sinner means, “I do this good not because it is good but
because it just suits me for I am not giving up my sins. I want my cake and to
eat it though I can’t do that”. The Bible says the saved always do some good
works which only they are capable of. It follows that every saved person will
have the power to do the best good work, give God’s light to others. So, if
anybody who is saved does not agree with the real meaning of the word of God
then that person is insincere and a fraud. The saved who believe themselves to
be sincere cannot associate with those who differ from them on a religious level
for that is making truth equal to error. You would have to know the Bible
teaching on salvation before you could be saved for the Bible has to speak of
salvation to you. To listen to a minister or whatever is not listening to God.
Thus, the popular Protestant notion that a Roman Catholic can be a saved person
in spite of being in a satanic Church is seriously mistaken.
Protestants hold that the obscure parts are just badly expressed by the author
and when that happens God makes sure what he is putting into their heads is
expressed clearly somewhere else in the Bible. How can an infallible interpreter
be needed when the Catholic Church has only interpreted seven texts? Moreover,
the Church says that this infallible interpretation does not involve psychic
powers but she has to research the ordinary way and the conclusion is preserved
against error. So when that is the way it goes about it why should the Church be
granted a monopoly on Bible teaching?
The Catholic Church says that if private interpretation is God’s law then why
can’t you judge books not to belong to your canon and drop them out? The
Christian reply to this is that if you are really open to the Holy Spirit you
will not do that for he will tell you he wrote the books through human authors.
The Catholic Church will then respond to this by saying that every sect
disagrees with the next and asking how do we know which one is being guided by
the Spirit? But the Catholic Church itself says that faith in the Catholic
Church has to be communicated privately to each individual by the Spirit in
order for faith to appear. So what difference does it make? It isn’t teaching
anything different in that from the sects. We see that the Church is
surreptitiously claiming that the Holy Spirit should only be believed to be
communicating grace to you if you are inclined to become or stay a Catholic. If
the Holy Spirit is thought to guide those who are truly open to him, to the
religion that is the truth, it is unfair to point to the disagreements among
those who claim to follow him as evidence that private interpretation is bad
news.
Catholics say you have to see the Bible as reliable and that its doctrine makes
sense and then see that it speaks of an infallible Church and that leads you to
the Catholic Church and to believe it when it says 72 books belong in the Bible
and are without error (Catholicism and Fundamentalism, page 126, 127). This all
involves private interpretation for you have to see these things for yourself.
You have to invoke the Holy Spirit to help you. The Protestant doctrine of
private interpretation is rejected though it is the foundation of the Catholic
religion too! The Church has to hide its belief in it for the principle
automatically gives you the right to form your own Church if you reach different
conclusions from the Catholic Church and are convinced that you are open to the
Spirit who wants you to take this action. That it is hid at all shows that
Catholicism is too fond of power.
The answer to people who say that Private Interpretation is wrong for there were
few Bibles before printing came in is that God meant the word to be read to the
people.
The Bible is its own infallible interpreter. The Bible says that it can be
understood without another infallible interpreter (Nehemiah 8:7, 12; 2
Corinthians 1:13). God would not write anything that could never be understood.
The Bible commands the Church to be united (1 Corinthians 1:10) which it would
not do unless scripture has only one true interpretation which anyone who loves
what is true can find. (It is people who create false interpretations not God.)
If Rome is right to say that the Bible is too obscure at times to be much good
then it is not the word of God for it says the Bible can be understood. The hard
to understand bits can be understood when the rest of the Bible is studied. It
seems unclear to the beginner like every book does but when one is careful and
studious one can know what it teaches. God may guide the beginner to learn from
those who have read and the beginner finds what they say in the Bible. Catholics
sometimes say that nobody can work out what is in the Athanasian Creed about the
Trinity from the Bible. This can be true without it meaning the Bible is not the
sole word of God (despite page 24, Church and Infallibility). The Creed can be a
help to see what the Bible means. The Trinity is a doctrine that cannot be
expressed without confusing people.
It is not just the Christian who can interpret the Bible by the guidance of God.
The unsaved can do this too for they cannot turn to Jesus for salvation unless
God speaks to their hearts in his telepathic way. God might speak even to people
he has predestined to damnation but the Bible says that the unsaved cannot
understand the things of God.
The Bible and Christian history that the heart is deceitful above all else so
you can think you are saved and not be. So, it would be arrogant and proud to
claim to be able to interpret the Bible by divine power if only true Christians
could do it.
Conclusion
We shouldn’t believe the claim of the Roman Catholic hierarchy to be equal in
authority to scripture when it wants to be.
WORKS CONSULTED
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS CATHOLICS ARE ASKING, Tony Coffey, Harvest House
Publishers, Oregon ,2006
Catholicism and Christianity, Cecil John Cadoux, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1928
Catholicism and Fundamentalism, Karl Keating, Ignatius Press, San Francisco,
1988
Encyclopaedia of Bible Difficulties, Gleason W Archer, Zondervan, Grand Rapids,
Michigan, 1982
Evangelical Catholics, A New Phenomenon, Stanley Mawhinney, Christian Ministries
Incorporated, Dundrum, Dublin, 1992
How to Interpret the Bible, Fr Francis Cleary, SJ, Ligouri, Missouri, 1981
Lectures and Replies, Thomas Carr, Archbishop of Melbourne, Australian Catholic
Truth Society, Melbourne, 1907
Lions Concise Book of Christian Thought, Tony Lane, Lyon, Herts, 1984
PAPAL SIN, STRUCTURES OF DECEIT, Garry Wills, Darton Longman and Todd, London,
2000
Reason and Belief, Bland Blanschard, London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1974
Roman Catholic Claims, Charles Gore, Longmans, London, 1894
Secrets of Romanism, Joseph Zachello, Loizeaux Brothers, New Jersey, 1984
The Bible Does Not Say So, Rev Roberto Nisbet, Church Book Room Press, London,
1966
The Church and Infallibility, BC Butler, The Catholic Book Club, London, undated
Traditional Doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church Examined, Rev CCJ Butlin,
Protestant Truth Society, London
Vicars of Christ, Peter de Rosa, Corgi, London, 1993
Whatever Happened to Heaven? Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1988
BIBLE QUOTATIONS FROM:
The Amplified Bible