ON THE LORD’S SUPPER
HERE IS A CHRISTIAN ARGUMENT FOR DROPPING THE COMMUNION SERVICE,
There has always been error in the Church. One error was the
early heresy that Jesus required the Church to celebrate the Lord’s
Supper in which bread and wine representing his body and blood are
eaten and drunk.
First of all, every single time Jesus says in the gospels, “Do this
in memory of me”, it is of questionable authenticity.
Secondarily, even if he did say, “Do this in memory of me”, he
didn’t give it as a command. Not everything Jesus asked for is
necessarily a command.
Thirdly, “Do this in memory of me” was spoken to those who were at
the table with him. There is nothing to indicate that it has
anything to do with us. The request could mean, remember me in the
general sense or it could mean remember me in the personal sense. We
remember Napoleon in the general sense for we don’t know him. We
remember our dead friends in the personal sense, we remember being
with them and what they were like. The obvious interpretation of
Jesus’ words is that he meant to be remembered in the personal
sense. We can’t do that so we don’t have to keep the Lord’s Supper.
Fourthly, Jesus never said that the apostles had to say his words,
"This is my body" and "This is my blood." He just gave them bread
and wine to consume and said they were his body and blood and for
the apostles to do as he did in his memory. Maybe he just meant,
"When you eat bread remember me" and "When you drink wine remember
my blood."
There is no text to say that this rite was to be practiced by
anybody other than the apostles who were at the table with Jesus. 1
Corinthians Chapter 11 has Paul saying that he received from the
Lord what he handed on to the people at Corinth namely what happened
at the Lord’s Supper and he told them to examine themselves before
they eat the bread and drink the cup for whoever eats and drinks
unworthily sins against the body and blood of the Lord.
He didn’t say the Corinthians were saying this is my body and blood
over bread and wine. He only said they were remembering Jesus with
bread and a cup in the middle of a meal and because they were doing
this unworthily by being in sin they were being punished. In other
words, they were making the gesture of honouring Jesus’ memory while
desecrating it by honouring sin by refusing to repent. Better to
turn away from sin than to remember Jesus for otherwise the
remembering is only insulting him. He gives no indication of
authorising the bread and wine memorial. He speaks in his letters of
letting some things go such as people who keep the old food
regulations for the sake of not being too harsh on them.
Given that nobody really loves God with all their heart and being as
Jesus commanded, unsurprisingly Paul says we always have sin in us
(Romans 3, Romans 7). That means nobody is ever fit to remember
Jesus using bread and wine as memorials. His warning the Corinthians
to examine themselves for sin before drinking and eating the
memorials was therefore an attempt to wean the Corinthians off the
ceremony. He didn’t want to forbid them but to make them realise for
themselves that it was wrong.
How does this square with Jesus asking the apostles to remember him
and giving them the memorials? Paul wrote earlier that the bread we
break is a sharing in the Body of Christ and we are all one body for
we all share the one bread. Paul said that the cup we bless is a
sharing in the blood of Christ. He does not mean the cup is blessed
as in being turned into the blood of Christ. The Jews used that
expression that the cup was blessed when they took wine and said
over it, "Blessed are you O Lord Our God King of the Universe who
has given us the fruit of the vine.". But it wasn't really being
blessed, it was just being used as an opportunity to bless God.
The answer is that what Jesus gave the apostles was only a memorial
not a ritual. We are to remember Jesus every time we take bread and
drink.
The Lord’s Supper is heresy. Anything that is turned into a command
by the Church that is not commanded by scripture is heresy.