CATHOLICISM’S ARTIFICIAL UNITY
A Church is a unity. There is visible unity and there is invisible or spiritual
unity. Visible unity is unity that we see – like in a football team - and the
other is unity of intent that cannot be seen. For an example of the latter, a
Catholic who believes in Protestantism would really be a Protestant though there
is no visible unity with it. You can have invisible unity without visible unity
but you cannot have visible unity without invisible unity. A football team that
has lots of disagreements under the surface is only a fake unity. So, you can
have a visible and invisible Church. The Church dishonestly uses the texts in
the New Testament that command the Church to be one people and one family
ignoring the fact that unity does not necessarily consist in visible unity
though it ought to (page 28, Roman Catholic Claims). The Church being human
could not stay one even if all were of one faith for factions would still oppose
one another.
The question
The Roman Catholic Church claims to be the only visible organisation and unity
established by God. The question we want to answer is, “Is the visible unity
claimed for the Roman Catholic Church real unity?” When a religion claims to be
the true religion it claims to be in visible unity, to be one religion. The true
Church has to be one for it is several Churches if it is not. The Roman Catholic
Church declares that she is one in faith and in government. And she perceives
this as evidence that she is the one true Church as if other religions couldn’t
mention their unity as evidence.
What makes a Church a Church?
Catholicism informs us that it could still be the true Church if it was totally
marinating in immorality so it is what it teaches that determines whether or not
it is this Church. Moreover, it is the one true Church even if all the members
hate each other and are not at one so it is agreement in matters of belief that
makes the true Church one.
A sinful Church cannot be one
Another reason that Catholic unity is nothing more than nominal is that if
mortal sin exists then the Church is disunited for she regards mortal sinners as
still being Catholics. Mortal sin is the complete turning of one’s back on God
and by implication, one’s neighbour, for love of God and love of neighbour are
mutually dependent (teaching of the First Epistle of John in the Bible). In
particular, mortal rejects proper intimate and spiritual unity with the Church.
How could a mortal sinner possibly be a Catholic or in union with the Church in
any proper way? The sinner might call himself a Catholic and go to Mass but his
unity with the Church is purely outward.
God is infinitely perfect and so he hates sin infinitely meaning it is intending
to offer infinite disrespect to God. If sin exists all sin is mortal which means
there are no Catholics. The mortal sinner turns away from truth for God is truth
therefore his faith has been renounced and replaced by artificial faith.
No true visible Church
If the Roman Catholic Church is not the true Church, and we have proved this to
be so, then some say there is no true visible Church and Jesus Christ was a
false prophet for his prediction that the gates of Hell would never prevail
against his Church failed (Matthew 16:18). This prophecy uses the expression
gates of Sheol and Sheol meant death in the Bible. The prophecy may just mean
that the Church could die but death will not triumph over it for it could be
raised up to life again in the resurrection of the dead. Also, Jesus could be
with false Christians to guide them back to the truth or closer to it so his
promise that he would abide with us forever would not be annulled by full and
total apostasy. God says that the prophet who makes a mistake and gives a
revelation that is not from the Lord is a fraud that should be ignored and
killed (Deuteronomy 18).
When most Christians think the Bible says the true Church will never leave the
earth, it follows that God does not approve of their faith in Jesus for they
impute false revelation to him and are following what they see as a false
prophet but refuse to admit it. This is true even if he is the Son of God for
they don’t know. We are talking subjective, not objective, here.
The sacraments of the Church only work if the minister intends to be a channel
of grace. A priest can pour water on a baby and say the magic words that are
used for the sacrament and be merely faking. If he refuses to give grace then
the baby is not validly baptised. It is the same with sacraments such as
ordination. The Church must have many members who only think they have been
baptised be the one visible true Church. The Church must have many priests and
bishops who only think they are ordained right. They have no evidence. They are
really only hoping that they are baptised and ordained! What a precarious unity!
This unity is so weak that it doesn’t deserve to be called unity.
The Church must be claiming to be the visible true Church just to attract
members. Why? Because the claim doesn’t make sense but people are discouraged
from thinking about religion so the Church gets away with it too much. The Roman
Church must in its heart agree with the Protestant concept that the true Church
is invisible to us for we don’t know who belongs to it even if they say they do
so only God sees the true Church and knows who is a member.
Not one in faith or government
The Catholic Church is not one in faith or in government. Therefore it is not a
Church but a pretend Church. The proofs for this prove the same about any other
group that claims to be the true Church like the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints. If Jesus was the Son of God he did not establish a visible
true Church for he could not. It is nonsense to say that a Church that is not a
Church could have the marks of universality, holiness and apostolicity. The
other three marks of the true Church depend on the universality or Catholicity
one. Yet the infallible Nicene Creed speaks of one, holy, Catholic and apostolic
Church.
Many accuse the Catholics of arrogance when they claim to constitute the true
Church. They counter that Jesus said it not them and he is God so God said it.
So they are telling us that they are not saying it but they are only saying that
God says it. But even if Jesus said his true Church would never leave the earth
there is no guarantee that the Roman Catholic Church is the same Church that he
founded. A fake pope could be elected one way or another. You cannot see if the
Church is run by real believers which would be necessary for preserving the
authenticity of the Church for example, many men in the college of Cardinals
could be fakes and not Catholics in their hearts. Therefore to believe in the
Catholic Church headed by Rome is really to put faith in man not God.
The Church does not have the right government to be from God because we are
supposed to believe God not man. Therefore the Church is divorced from God.
Jesus never said that his apostles would remain true to the faith he taught
forever. Even if Roman Catholicism is the apostolic Church it is still no
guarantee of authenticity. The Church is advocating arrogance with its claim
that Catholics are part of the true Church for only a handful of Catholics are
able to give well-thought out reasons why the Church is true and they still
manage to be wrong and flout logic. You evidently need an encyclopaedic
knowledge of history, canon law, logic, ecclesiology (theology of the Church)
and scripture to be able to properly defend the authenticity of the Church and
nobody can have that amount of knowledge. You would need to know the minute by
minute history of the popes and the Councils of the Church and their
participants to be sure that there was no chance they could have ridden the
Church into inauthenticity for it only takes one second for that to happen. It
takes only one secret thought to destroy the work of God to make a pope lose his
legitimacy and make the Church illegitimate. What claims God made are
irrelevant. The Church says that God promised that the Church would never lose
the faith as if that settles it! You would need to check it out first to be sure
that it happened so then you could conclude that God maybe did make the promise.
The claim to be the true Church is incompatible with humility. Anybody who does
not claim to be in the true Church but who claims to have the only true saviour
Jesus is really no better. How do they know that he is the only plausible
candidate?
A unity between deceived people who have many cheating leaders is artificial
because relationships need to be based on trust and honesty to be real. They are
based on open-mindedness and helping each other to find their own path even if
it means going out of the Church. The deceptions of the Church will lead to
sectarianism and cannot lead to much else despite the work for unity. Those
Catholics who say that the evidence for their religion is sufficient but not
very convincing and then to claim to be the true Church must ask themselves if
they possess the sin of arrogance in their hearts. The true Church then would
have to be the most convincing one and pass logical tests. You need a miraculous
pile of knowledge to claim to be the most convincing sect and it is vulgar to
claim to be the true Church without it.
Finally
There is more to unity than just being put through certain rites of initiation
and carrying a label. Catholicism's unity is artificial and superficial. The
unity is largely a screen made up of some cultural elements advertised as
religion.