The Christian religion provides the perfect cover for perverts who prey on children. It does this through its doctrine and history shows evidence of abnormally high level of sex abuse of minors.

Even today, you have cases were Christians in plain sight seem to get away with engaging in and protecting child sexual abuse.

Idaho in one decade (2000 to 2010) had over 4,000 children who were married and often by force. It is known that the youngest was about 13. It shows you do not need Islam in a nation for that to happen. Christianity at times leads to child marriages too. It was Christians who refused to vote for a ban on such fake marriages, on such child abuse. How could such a thing happen? What kind of religion does that?

Jesus said that a good tree is only shown in its real nature when the fruit appears. He should know for he was the one who wanted divorce banned to female children who were wed at 11 or 12.

Yahoo Answers makes Bible believers show their true colours. They defend the paedophilia approved in the Bible which saw girls too young for sex being married off to men just because they won't admit that the Bible far from being the word of a good God is obscene and whoever makes a child read it uncensored should be hauled up before the courts. The excuse was that those girls were not considered underage in those days! What would they say to a paedophile who said he was not doing wrong by going after 12 year old girls because they are not really underage and that the law is stating a fiction by saying that they are?

One reason marriage is condoned so young is that people didn't live long but that is only an excuse. A wife-girl dying in childbirth at 12 or 13 for her body is not ready proves that. You marry when ready and that is that even if you only have a year left. Another reason is that if sex happens before marriage, marriage must be provided to avoid scandal so the low age is a reward for having sex with a 11 year old.
Many minors and children are abused sexually by close relatives. Church teaching on incest has little credibility for the infallible Council of Trent decreed, "If any one shall say, that those degrees only of consanguinity and affinity, which are set down in Leviticus, can hinder matrimony from being contracted, and dissolve it when contracted; and that the Church cannot dispense in some of those degrees, or ordain that others may hinder and dissolve it; let him be anathema." The Church thought it had the power to allow incestuous marriage between cousins. It is obvious that if cousin marriage is wrong then a dispensation cannot make it right. The Church is deliberately endorsing incest - it allows what it treats as forbidden.

The Bible which is supposedly God's truth says not a single word against the abuse of a female child in a sexual context. People who have sex with animals are condemned but they are surely less common than those who try to have sex with children of 5 or 6. The silence is telling. If the child is married to the abuser then their rape is condoned. Divorce was allowed too so the man could have sex with a female child and dump her and get a divorce and get another child. This is tacit approval of child sex abuse.

The Bible provides more direct justification too.

It follows then that any Church that claims to follow the teaching of the Bible as the word of God is teaching that paedophilia is acceptable - whether it realises it or not. The Bible itself commands child-abuse for it says that anybody who does not know that their sins murdered Jesus who had to atone for them by his death and rise so that we could rise too will be damned forever in the agony of Hell. These are awful things to tell a child. It is the kind of stuff that would make some children kill when they grow up on the basis that they have committed murder anyway and when it is committed once it is easier to do it again. The Bible even accuses them of a sin traced back to Adam. It tells them that a being some old men says exists has to be put before themselves and their parents and all love must be given to him and a depraved old book commanding murder and hatred and hypocrisy in the name of love must be accepted as the word of God.

There is no end to the evil that the Church pumps into children. The Bible is a palliative for the conscience of the paedophile. The priest claims to be giving you the most important thing there is, faith in God and in his true Church. But the priest takes no responsibility for what harm this does. He will not compensate you for that. If giving him money is not letting him steal off you then nothing is stealing when he dares to ask for such a serious commitment to his Church. That is the kind of respect they have for you! Tell them where to stick their apologies.

A major rabbi Judah the Prince insisted that when a girl had full pubic hair she was mature. The Amorai Safrda – Yevamot 12b expresses an alternative tradition that two pubic hairs meant the girl was now a woman and to be sexually available in marriage. As girls of 8 can experience this it shows how young girls could be raped and it would be treated as adult rape and not child abuse.  As Christianity borrowed from Judaism we can be sure that many prelates in the Church had the same notions.
In Matthew 5:17-19, Jesus sanctioned the Jewish law and condemned any attempt to water down any of its commandments. This proves he agreed with the paedophilia it blessed.
Is it not child abuse to tell a child that Jesus came to save us from everlasting punishing and that they are guilty of Adam’s sin and their sins are the reason why Jesus had to be crucified? It is so we conclude that child abuse is built into the Christian system. The system implies that paedophilia is permissible. 

The doctrine of Jesus Christ that if your brother hurts you seventy times a day you must forgive him seventy times makes paedophiles feel victimised by those who detest them. It makes them feel that if the victim is damaged, it is because the victim failed to forgive as Jesus asked. The claim that Jesus has the miraculous power to turn a sinner into a holy person rapidly if that person only co-operates and asks for the grace urges them to blame the victim. The lack of compassion in the clergy and religious for the victims of paedophile clergy and religion can be explained by those doctrines. Doctrines such as that if you don't forgive, you are punishing yourself for what somebody else did to you don't help.
Paedophiles often feel a hatred and disgust for themselves after they commit vile acts. Sadly, Christian teaching about this forgiving God helps them deal with that self-hate. They use religion to relieve it. Thus the self-hate won't last long enough to deter them from future acts of abuse. Priests claim they can forgive the sin of paedophilia so these priests were virtually encouraging their colleagues to engage in it by trivialising it with cheap forgiveness and relieving feelings of shame and guilt. The paedophile priest should feel supported by going to confession.
Children have a tendency to believe in fairies and witches and Santa Claus and God and Jesus and tooth fairies and other supernatural beings. Religion seeks to keep a part of you childish, the part of you that reaches out to believe in God. Paedophiles are stuck at a childish stage which causes their disorder. Religion is helping to develop their disorder by promoting supernaturalism in children and urging them to childishly hold on to it.

It is common in the United States for normal people who report an experience where they were raped by aliens or sexually abused. Some Christians think demons sexually molested them. There have to be children who taken with Santa Claus were sure he came down the chimney and subjected them to vile sexual abuse. Any form of paranormal or supernatural belief can make people suffer that illusion. But to them it is as devastating and tormenting as the real thing. Religion opens the door to such illusion and belittles the suffering in doing so. It is best for there to be no traditions about aliens or ghosts or Jesuses or Santas than for one child to suffer as a result. A child sees dreams and reality as much the same so parents need to take responsibility for what they are telling their children. The scars that will be incurred will be permanent.
The Church teaches that children are to be given confession and communion around the age of seven or eight for then they have the use of reason and can reject God by mortal sin or sin that takes you to Hell forever should you die. Strange that children can make the ultra-mammoth decision, the most serious decision of all namely where to spend eternity, and cannot marry or consent to sex. It is no wonder with absurd and vicious doctrines like this that paedophile priests do not think they took advantage of the children they had sex with.
The history of the Church shows that clerical child abusers showed no real tendency to try and get treatment for their paedophilia. Many paedophiles seek such treatment. The question is why the priestly ones don't even when they can. They have to be forced by their bishops to get help. And the help is really about making it look like they tried to change than about really trying to cease being a danger to children. It is about pulling the wool over the eyes of the flock. It has been observed by Laszlo Bito Phd that the priests guilty of the abuse have not showing any signs of intense remorse or guilt. They do not take every avenue they can to control their urges. The repentance they offer is light and pathetic. It insults the victims. It is more superficial than anything else.
The Church likes its scripture Acts 23:5. There the high priest has Paul the apostle struck and Paul retorts that he is a hypocrite for violating the law in doing that. He calls him a whitewashed wall. He then apologises citing as divine law the rule that you shall not speak evil of an authority. Texts like that only facilitate cover-ups in the Catholic priesthood.


The Christian and Bible religion endangers children and helps paedophiles especially those in a religious leadership role to justify themselves.  I would add that they say that being paedophile is not a sin as long as you refrain from acting on it.  I have found paedophiles online wondering if Jesus was one.

ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS CATHOLICS ARE ASKING, Tony Coffey, Harvest House Publishers, Oregon ,2006
Breaking the Silence, One Garda's Quest to Find the Truth, Martin Ridge, Gill & Macmillan, Dublin, 2008 order from Gill & Macmillan, Hume Avenue, Park West, Dublin 12
PAPAL SIN, STRUCTURES OF DECEIT, Garry Wills, Darton Longman and Todd, London, 2000
Putting Away Childish Things, Uta Ranke-Heinmann, HarperSanFrancisco, 1992
THE POWER AND THE GLORY, Inside the Dark Heart of John Paul II's Vatican, David Yallop, Constable, London, 2007
The Womb and the Tomb, Hugh Montifiore, Fount – HarperCollins, London, 1992
Sex, Priests and Secret Codes, Thomas P Doyle, A W R Sipe and Patrick J Wall, Volt Press, Los Angeles, California, 2006
Son of Joseph, The Parentage of Jesus, Geoffrey Parrinder, T & T Clark, Edinburgh, 1992
God Is Not Great, The Case Against Religion, Christopher Hitchens, Atlantic Books, London, 2007


No Copyright