DID JESUS GET BROKEN BONES DURING HIS CRUCIFIXION?
Christianity cannot give you a prediction from the Old Testament that the Messiah would rise from the dead. To distract from that plot hole it fires other predictions at you instead.
Here is a major one.
Psalm 34:20. The just man’s bones shall not be broken.
Alleged Fulfilment. Jesus’ bones were not broken.
New Testament Interpretation. The same according to John 19:36.
The Truth. The psalm is not speaking of Jesus for the context says that the man
whose bones are looked after is rescued from all trouble by God which the New
Testament says did not happen to Jesus. The psalm doesn’t claim to be a
prophecy. And absolutely no evidence is offered in the New Testament that Jesus’
bones were not broken. John says Jesus fulfilled the prophecy when his bones
were undamaged. But he never says he was sure of this. How could he be for he
was not a doctor and corpses can have broken bones that are unnoticeable. It is
dishonest to use a prophecy like that.
Worse, the claim that a bone of his will not be broken, as John quoted it, which
is the exact wording is not the original wording. The Hebrew original states
that not a bone of it will be broken while the Septuagint changed the it to a
he.
Even if Jesus’ legs had been broken, the Christians would have assumed they
were not. When the body was out of the way they knew they would get away with
it. When they read his life back into the Old Testament they would have paid no
attention to this psalm. In other words, the reference to no bones breaking
could mean that the Christians took it for granted that Jesus’ bones did not
break even if the soldiers did try to smash his knees. They would say they did
not succeed in smashing them though it looked as if they did because God made
the bones unbreakable. Had the bones been smashed the Christians might say that
the restoration of the bones and their healing in the resurrection would be what
the prophet meant. Or they might say that the Romans and Jews inspired by Satan
chose to pretend that Jesus' knees did break.
The New Testament says the Jews wanted the three men on the crosses including
Jesus to have their legs smashed to kill them. If they couldn't use their legs
to take a breath they would die rapidly. The Romans complied but didn't
bother with Jesus as he was dead already. It is hard to believe that as legs had
to be broken even if the person seemed dead on the cross just to make sure, that
Jesus was exempted. The New Testament is anxious to deny that Jesus got any
broken bones from his horrible death but if he was nailed to the tree and
pierced by a spear bone breakage had to happen. The crucified ankle found in
Jerusalem has the nail jutting out from the side.
Some versions of what Jesus said at the last supper go, "This is my body which is broken for you." His breaking of the bread while saying that is a prophecy in action. If I did not want to convey that image, I would use a knife on the bread. Then I would give it to each of them. THEN I would say, "This is my body which is given for you." That avoids indicating that the body will be broken up. If Jesus expected to be mangled and broken up in the communal dump for criminals then we would expect him to do what the gospels say he did.
The Turin Shroud shows a head that is not part of the body and a leg that
seems broken...it is not real but some think it is... best then given a mention!