DUBIOUS STIGMATISTS
VISIT
https://drvitelli.typepad.com/providentia/2015/03/bearing-the-stigmata.html
Stigmata is the miracle of where God puts the crucifixion marks of Jesus on a
person's body so that they may suffer for sinners or as a sign. The most famous
stigmatist was Padre Pio who had superficial wounds but who tried to manipulate
people to think they were deep marks and who was using chemicals to make the
marks. The best medical assessments of him found that the wounds were only skin
deep. When he died his skin was clear.
There is no scarcity of people who go to a lot of trouble to be accepted as
stigmatists when they are probably not for real.
Jane Hunt – An Anglican Stigmatist. An embarrassment to the Roman Church which
boasts that it is the only religion that has real miracles. Her stigmata is far
more impressive than that of Padre Pio but she is a fraud if Roman Catholicism
is the true faith.
St Francis of Assisi – An oddball who once stripped nude in public – hmm I
wonder if this exhibitionism was what drove him to make his stigmata if he did
make it. There is no evidence that he didn’t make the wounds himself (nor did
the Church ever claim to have any) and there is none that he did either but when
in doubt we have to accept the natural explanation. There is doubt if Francis
exhibited hand and feet wounds at all for he seems to have had lumps of flesh
there in the shape of a nail. The flesh formed a head like a nail and where a
nail would come out there was a point of flesh. Pope Alexander IV in 1255 stated
in a Papal Bull that the nails were either made of flesh or some other substance
(page 68, The Bleeding Mind). The question arises then is this, did Francis glue
these things to his body? They could have been made of resin that was stuck to
his body. The heads of the nails were round and black and it is bizarre and
suspicious that the point of the nail was curved (page 104)
Francis imposed severe fasts on himself when he was very unwell and yet his
behaviour was apparently sanctioned by God in the stigmata! It is certain that
the canonisation that took place two years after his death is not worth the
paper it is written on. The Roman Catholic stigmata critic, Fr Herbert Thurston
SJ examined all the stigmatics since St Francis and curiously concluded that St
Francis was the only case that was satisfactory though that did not mean he
thought he was the only true stigmatist. He felt that since Francis was
undeniably holy that he couldn’t have faked. But to anybody who does not believe
in the miracle it would seem that the existence of the stigmata was proof that
he was not as holy as he made everybody think. Holiness has nothing to do with
proving the miracle.
Sor Maria de la Visitacon – a stigmatist Dominican nun who was found to be
authentic by the Church investigation and even the physicians declared her to be
genuine in 1587 after she was caught painting on the wounds. Later the
Inquisition armed with soap and water soon proved the accusation. Her side wound
was an inch long which would lead some ignorant people to argue that when it was
such a pathetic effort she didn’t inflict it herself so it must have been real -
they always find some bizarre excuse for believing. Moreover, when she was a
fake despite all the authentication what does that say about the other
stigmatics?
Anne Catherine Emmerich – a stigmatised Augustinian German nun who reported
many revelations full of absurd statements and anachronisms. She saw the
apostles decked out in vestments! Vestments came in in the Christian faith
centuries later as imitations of the day to day clothing of the apostles. The
apostles never wore vestments. The message is the important thing and when she
could not manage to get it right her stigmata did not come from God. Too many
revelations is a bad sign for God calls his people to live by faith not sight.
Her visions identified a house in Ephesus as the house of the virgin. In reality
it was a Church from AD 600 (page 155, The Marian Conspiracy). She has Mary and
John the apostle going to Ephesus to live. But this is based on the error that
the disciple Jesus loved who was at the cross with Mary and given to Mary as her
adopted son was John. The earliest account has John demolishing the temple of
Artemis by miracle power and Mary is not mentioned. And it is an account that
comes from a top Church Father, Clement of Alexandria! Emmerich has Mary assumed
into Heaven. When she and Church tradition are wrong about Mary living and dying
in Ephesus how could they be right that Mary went to Heaven body and soul? How
could they have any evidence?
Domenica Lazzari – A stigmatist known for a mask of blood that caked over her
face and who could not bear sunlight or anything too loud and her senses were
extremely and unusually fine-tuned and used to take convulsions in which she hit
her chest so hard it was a wonder she didn’t break the rib cage. She was
regarded by investigators as authentic because visitors were allowed into her
bedroom where she lay paralysed at any time and because her sister who lived
with her wanted no money and was a simple woman. That kind of evidence is not
good enough. There have been millions of supernatural frauds who acted humble
and unmaterialistic. She claimed that her senses were so strong that even faint
noises from several yards away caused her great discomfort – claims like that
are a big help to getting people out of the way and to distract them for fear of
annoying her so that she could perform her tricks.
Marie-Julie Jahenny- had stigmata on her breast which she revealed a bit too
eagerly for comfort. God would not organise a miracle that would cause such
immodesty. Catholics hold that she fell away from the faith (page 30, The
Stigmata and Modern Science).
Bertha Mrazek – after an allegedly miraculous cure this lady who had training
in trickery at a circus manifested the stigmata. Believers thought she did not
fake the stigmata because the wounds in the palm were slits while at the back
there was just a pinprick for a faker would have consistent and more flamboyant
wounds (so we should believe people who have the side wound on their backsides
then should we?). Arch-sceptic Fr Herbert Thurston believed she was not
inflicting them on herself. The lady was later found out to have obtained money
by deception, committed adultery and had a lovechild, and to have been insane.
She suffered from hysteria which many researchers believe gives some unusual
people the power to make themselves bleed just by desire.
Teresa Neumann – this stigmatist was known to bleed only when Professor
Martini the person doing the investigating was out of the room (page 52, The
Bleeding Mind). She made movements that were so unnecessary and bizarre that he
was not impressed by her and thought she might have been doing conjuring tricks
to make herself bleed. When she was allegedly not eating thanks to another
miracle there was plenty of medical evidence that she was during the period when
she was not watched round the clock (page 115, The Bleeding Mind). There is
nothing anybody can do to lift these suspicions now. She may have faked her
stigmata when she apparently faked the living without food miracle.
A peer report available online is clear: "Abstract:
Therese Neumann, from Konnersreuth in Bavaria, developed stigmata at the age of
29 and allegedly lived without any food for 36 years. After a fire accident in
1918, she suffered from paralysis, deafness, and blindness. Later she developed
stigmata on her extremities and left side of the thorax, bleeding lesions in the
skin, bleeding in the eye region, and altered states of consciousness in the
form of "visions" of religious content. On the basis of a report by her
physician, Dr. Otto Seidl, to the Bishopric Ordinariate of Regensburg (1927) and
a manuscript for presentation before the Catholic Medical Society of the
Netherlands (1928) Seidl had no doubt of the authenticity of these phenomena,
and he diagnosed hysteria. While under surveillance by four nuns for 14 days,
Neumann exhibited no intake of nourishment; weight measurements and urine tests
however suggest the opposite. Investigation in a clinic was refused. Her case is
interpreted here in the light of contemporary psychiatry. As far as medical
records go, Therese Neumann's is one of a series of surprisingly similar cases
of stigmata development, conversion disorder, and alleged absence of nutrition.
In nosological terms, these would be classified today as dissociative
disorders." Nervenarzt. 2008 Jul;79(7):836-43. doi:
10.1007/s00115-008-2475-5.
[Stigmatisation and absence of nutrition in the case of Therese Neumann
(1898-1962)].
Rev Paul Siwek, S.J checked her out. He wrote about
possessing “the gravest doubts about the genuineness of the marvels attributed
to Teresa" but held fast to saying she had "solid Christian virtues and genuine
mystical states.” Reading between the lines he thinks she may have caused her
stigmata and may have eaten while not knowing what she was doing.