Analyse, “Without evil excessive unnecessary evil would not be possible.”
Religion tends to argue that evil though deplorable fits a loving God as long
as God remains the one in control. Critics point to excessive unnecessary evil
as a possible disproof of God for some evil really is useless. It may be seen as
sufficient evidence if not proof that there is no loving God. The dispute
about is whether it really is unnecessary for God sees more than we do. So at
best there is no way to tell one way or the other.
What good is there in a good person who nobody knows about who dies in a forest
fire and who will never be known or found? There are real world events that seem
to be excessive and useless evil. The hypothetical is important too. What if a
baby was born whose suffering was terrible and totally useless and therefore
wanton? The hypothetical goes with respect for people. You have to say that we
must be prepared for useless evil and to be aware that it happens even if we
don’t know or can’t know. It is not your right to say that no baby will suffer
in vain.
So now we have found a way to tell one way or the other about excessive
necessary evil. We have to take it for granted that it happens. We have an
inherent human right to. So now we know we have no right to assume that
God is taking care of people in the midst of every evil. Now we know that the
evil indicates – or maybe proves – there is no God. Even it is not proof we have
to act as if it is for it is so serious. While it would be great to disprove God
because of evil, the fact remains that it is our duty to take evil so seriously
that we can treat it as a disproof even if it is not.
Talking about evil and excessive evil is dubious for it comes across as, evil that is a blessing in disguise and evil that is not. Evil that is turned into a blessing in disguise is still a blessing in disguise. It will be hard to see it as real evil.
Evil and excessive evil could be just splitting hairs. Or there could be no important difference between them even if there is. The could be is enough to make such differentiation disgraceful. You don't play with evil like that for there is a human cost.