THE ALLEGEDLY PARANORMAL SIDE OF GARABANDAL VISIONS
Garabandal is a village in Northern Spain in the diocese of Santander. Our Lady of Mount Carmel appeared there from 1961 to 1965 to Conchita Gonzalez, Jacinta Gonzalez, Mari Cruz Gonzalez and Mari-Loli Mazon. The Virgin wore a white dress and a blue mantle. A crown of twelve stars rested upon her head. The children said she bore a close resemblance to the face of the Turin Shroud. They said, “No other woman looks like her or sounds like her”.
The intriguing thing is not the apparitions but the alleged paranormal
happiness surrounding them.
Joe Nickell tells us that none of the allegedly supernatural events that
happened at Garabandal can be proved to be supernatural (Looking for a Miracle,
Prometheus Books, New York, page 182). None of the miracles such as the weight
of the children during ecstasy when nobody could lift them up, the contortions
of the body with the head nearly touching they waists and the racing backwards
down the steep hills were done under the right test conditions (page 178, Powers
of Darkness, Powers of Light). If the children had secretly fastened themselves
to the ground somehow you can be sure that people who tried to lift them did not
try too hard in case they would have injured them. A loose dress will move away
from the back and hang if the head with the shoulders is put far back – a child
can often put it back further than an adult – giving the illusion that the waist
is nearer the head than it really is.
The children running backwards down treacherous slopes without falling could be
explained by their being taken over by the subconscious mind which remembers
everything more accurately. Practice could help there too.
They also were able to take objects to the Virgin for blessing and give them back to the owners without making a mistake. Wedding rings were collected and returned by the children to the rightful owners. But wedding rings have an average size and look the same especially in backward areas where there is not much of a selection. And if a person were stupid enough to let them have their ring they would have been too embarrassed to admit it had they received the wrong ring back. Some of them might have discreetly returned a ring they received by mistake to the real owner.
Self-discipline could account for the visionaries’ seeming insensitivity to
pain when needles were stick in them during their visions. A pinprick will not
make you jump when you are expecting it or when you are afraid of the
consequences of responding to it and showing that your trance is probably faked.
Garabandal is famous for Conchita’s Miracle of the Host. In this, an invisible
angel would give her communion which would materialise on her tongue. A witness
said that he host did not seem to be put on the tongue but just materialised
there (Looking for a Miracle, page 183). The witnesses did not see the wafer
appearing in space and floating on to her tongue. It just materialised there.
A film was made of the event. Some sweets stick to the roof of the mouth for a
few seconds and then drop down. Conchita could have pushed a white round flat
one up to make it stick just before she opened her mouth and put her tongue out
so that it would fall on her tongue. The thing on her tongue does not really
look like a communion wafer but like something wet and spongy. Did she use
ordinary bread? Did the sweet in the roof of her mouth melt causing foam to drip
onto her tongue?
The host looked spongy (page 133, Powers of Darkness, Powers of Light). If you
push some saliva back and forth though the gaps in your teeth it becomes white
and spongy looking. Was this the host of Garabandal? Moreover, the light was
poor (page 89, The Book of Miracles) and many of the people walked past her for
she was in an alley and dripped down to her knees so suddenly (ibid, page 89).
She deliberately chose a time in which people would be distracted enough not to
notice anything amiss.
Don Benjamin Gomez was a farmer Potes. According to him, "I was standing at less
than an arm's length from the girl. I saw very well that her tongue was
completely clean of everything. The girl did not move. Suddenly there appeared
on it the Sacred Host. It was white, shining and resplendent. It reminded one of
the snow when the sun strikes it with its brilliant rays. The girl's face was
beautifully transformed into heavenly ecstasy. Her face was angelic I can
certify that she was there motionless, moving neither hands nor tongue. In this
motionless position she received the Sacred Host. We had enough time to
contemplate this marvelous phenomenon without any undue haste, and we were many
who saw it. I was an unbeliever until that day. I am not such a Catholic as to
be subject to any hallucination or imagination. I had not concerned myself about
God until then except to offend Him. I went to confession in April but previous
to that time I had not gone to confession for twenty-three years."
None of that is true. The girl did not look beautiful but sinister. The host
appeared gradually. He said it was like the snow in the sun. Another said it was
not. This testimony shows how people get excited and inaccurate.
The Virgin herself in the last apparition to Conchita expressed unhappiness that
she had chewing gum in her mouth. Conchita had to spit it out. "At that very
moment I saw Her with the Child in her arms. She was dressed as usual and
smiling. I told Her, 'I have come to bring you the rosaries so that you can kiss
them.' She said to me, 'I can see it.' I had been chewing gum, but as I was
seeing Her I did not chew it; I placed the gum on a tooth. She must have noticed
for She said, 'Conchita why don't you get rid of the chewing gum and offer it up
as a sacrifice for the glory of my Son?' I, a bit ashamed of myself, took it out
and threw it on the ground." Was chewing gum the host in the Miracle of the
Host? She was fond of the chewing gum - she even chewed it when about to see
Mary. Had the host miracle went wrong and people seen it was chewing gum she
would used that excuse.
Conchita according to Father J Pelletier admitted that she stole a communion
host from a Tabernacle to fake her miracle of the host. The Church said that the
judgement if the vision was real or not or from God or Satan or a lie rested
entirely on the bishop of the diocese of Santander. Rome was confident that the
bishop could make the right decision – knowing that he maintained a hostile
stance towards the apparitions. Rome's acceptance of the bishop's right reflects
Rome’s scepticism about the apparition. The apparition of Garabandal surpasses
all the rest in supernatural prowess and only philosophy and not science or even
evidence can prove that the supernatural was not supernatural. And yet the
vision was a fake despite its good fruits and the convincing miracle reports
that came with it. That warns us about Lourdes and other spiritual disneylands
like Medjugorje. (Read more about the information in the last three paragraphs
in the website The Most Dangerous False Apparition in the World.)
The testimonies of strange things happening are many. But none of the miracle
events happened under test conditions. We must remember that similar stories are
told about psychics such as Uri Gellar. Looking at the stories it seems very
impressive. But when the psychics are put in the lab under test conditions the
end result is anything but marvellous.
God would only do miracles for grave reasons. They are signs. They cannot be
signs unless they can be checked out by scientists and qualified investigators
and magicians. Until they are checked out, they are just interesting stories.
They are not signs. True visionaries would be very keen on being tested and
checked out. They would ask people not to be gullible and believe everything but
to keep open minds.
Religionists know that people can lie about miracles happening, they can be
mistaken or they can be telling the truth. It is possible that an apparition can
seem to be very strong evidence for the supernatural and still be based on lies
or errors or both and not be supernatural at all. How will you know how much
evidence you need? You would need to do experiments. You would need to set up
fake apparitions and see how reliable or unreliable those who testify to their
supernaturality are. That is the only way you can discover the level of evidence
you need before judging something as supernatural. We don't really have the
right to say that anything supernatural happened at Garabandal - no matter how
convincing it seems right now - until we first sort out this problem. An
apparition asking for acceptance without the problem being dealt with is
cheating us. What else is it lying about?
It would be very strange if the reported Catholic signs and wonders of
Garabandal had really happened when you can read books such as The Rite (The
Rite: The Making of a Modern Exorcist, Matt Baglio, Pocket Books, London, 2010)
which show how unimpressive Catholicism's diagnoses of demonic possession and
its exorcisms are! Exorcism would be a better sign than healings or miracles or
prophecies that God is with the Catholic Church and that the Church is invested
with his power. Yet the Church shows no real ability to cast out demons. For
example, the Church teaches that mental illness and possession can go together
and the demon can make the victim act mentally ill though he or she is not.
Clearly the Church just assumes the person has a demon - this is blatantly
wicked. And more so when the Church holds that demons like to hide their
presence in the victim. Talk about irresponsible diagnosis . Even if a
supernatural entity were possessing the victim, the Church has no right to say
that entity is a demon who is damned in Hell and pure evil. It might not be that
evil and besides to tell the victim he is possessed by evil is not helping him
or her.
In Garabandal, we have the best authenticated incidences of miracles – though
not accepted by the Church - ever and yet the apparition undermines the Church
and makes false prophecy. It was not from God. It was not from Satan either who
would never come saying that his appearance in the guise of the Mary would be
the last ever. Garabandal proves that believing in the Church because of stories
about a man rising from the dead and so on is foolery for miracles prove
nothing. At best they prove the paranormal.
There is no evidence at all that the lady appeared. Children with paranormal
abilities could use them and lie about seeing her. Garabandal became famous not
for the apparitions so much as the apparently paranormal events. The children
gave the Virgin rosaries to kiss. All they did was hold them up. Never did the
rosaries show any sign that somebody invisible was taking them and kissing them.
Some time after the visions Mari-Loli and Conchita concurred that "it is as if
that had been a dream, and as if all that had happened to another person." This
lack of clarity and certainty makes the message useless. A supernatural or
paranormal vision should be able to impress itself on the mind.
BOOKS CONSULTED
Ballinspittle, Moving Statues and Faith, Tim Ryan and Jurek Kirakowski, Mercier
Press, Dublin, 1985
Beauraing and Other Apparitions, Fr Herbert Thurston, Burns, Oates & Washbourne,
London, 1934
Believing in God, PJ McGrath, Millington Books in Association with Wolfhound,
Dublin, 1995
Bernadette of Lourdes, Rev CC Martindale, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1970
Biblical Exegesis and Church Doctrine, Raymond E Brown, Paulist Press, New York,
1985
Catholic Prophecy, The Coming Chastisement Yves Dupont, TAN, Illinois, 1973
Comparative Miracles, Fr Robert D Smith, B. Herder Book Co, St Louis, Mo, 1965
Counterfeit Miracles, BB Warfield, The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, 1995
Cults and Fanatics, Colin & Damon Wilson, Siena, London, 1996
Divine Mercy in My Soul, Sr M Faustina Kowalska, Marian Press, Massachusetts,
1987
Eleven Lourdes Miracles, Dr D J West, Duckworth, London, 1957
Encountering Mary, Sandra Zimdars-Swartz, Avon, New York, 1991
Evidence of Satan in the Modern World, Leon Cristiani, TAN, Illinois, 1974
From Fasting Saints to Anorexic Girls, Walter Vandereycken and Ron van Deth,
Athlone Press, London, 1996
Fatima in Lucia’s own Words, Sr Lucia, Postulation Centre, Fatima, 1976
Fatima Revealed…And Discarded, Brother Michael of the Holy Trinity, Augustine,
Devon, 1988
From the Visions of the Venerable Anne Catherine Emmerich, Topic Newspapers,
Mullingar, undated
Garabandal, a Message for the World, Ave Maria Publications, Middleton, Co
Armagh
Introduction to the Devout Life, St Francis de Sales, Burns Oates and Washbourne
Limited, London, 1952
Looking for a Miracle, Joe Nickell, Prometheus Books, New York, 1993
Miracles in Dispute, Ernst and Marie-Luise Keller, SCM, London, 1969
Miracles, Ronald A Knox, Catholic Truth Society, London, 1937
Mother of Nations, Joan Ashton, Veritas, Dublin, 1988
New Catholic Encyclopedia, The Catholic University of America and the
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., Washington, District of Columbia, 1967
Objections to Roman Catholicism, Edited by Michael de la Bedoyere, Constable,
London, 1964
Our Lady of Beauraing, Rev J.A. Shields, M.A., D.C.L., M.H. Gill and Son, Ltd.,
Dublin, 1958
Padre Pio, Patrick O Donovan, Catholic Truth Society, London
Please Come Back to Me and My Son R Vincnet, Ireland’s Eye, Mullingar, 1992
Powers of Darkness, Powers of Light, John Cornwell, London, 1992
Rosa Mystica, Franz Speckbacher, Divine Mercy Publications, Dublin, 1986
San Damiano, S di Maria, The Marian Centre, Hungerford, 1983
Spiritual Healing, Martin Daulby and Caroline Mathison, Geddes & Grosset, New
Lanark, Scotland, 1998
St Catherine Laboure of the Miraculous Medal, Fr Joseph I Dirvin C.M., Tan,
Illinois, 1984
The Apparition at Knock, A Survey of Facts and Evidence, Fr Michael Walsh, St
Jarlath’s College, Tuam, Co Galway, 1959
The Apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary Today, Rene Laurentin, Veritas,
Dublin 1990
The Appearances of the Blessed Virgin Mary at the Grotto of Lourdes, JB Estrade,
Art & Book Company Ltd, Westminster, 1912
The Autobiography of St Margaret Mary, TAN, Illinois, 1986
The Book of Miracles, Stuart Gordon, Headline, London, 1996
The Cult of the Virgin Mary, Michael P Carroll, Princeton University Press, 1986
The Evidence for Visions of the Virgin Mary, Kevin McClure Aquarian Press,
Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, 1985
The Exaltation of the Virgin Mary, by Rev S.G. Poyntz, M.A., B.D., Association
for Promoting Christian Knowledge, Dublin, 1955
The Holy Shroud and Four Visions, Rev Patrick O Connell and Rev Charles Carty,
TAN, Illinois, 1974
The Holy Shroud and the Visions of Maria Valtorta, Msgr Vincenzo Celli, Kolbe
Publications Inc., Sheerbrooke, California, 1994
The Incorruptibles, Joan Carroll Cruz, Tan, Illinois, 1977
The Medjugorje Deception, E Michael Jones, Fidelity Press, Indiana, 1998
The Physical Phenomena of Mysticism, Fr Herbert Thurston, Burns, Oates &
Washbourne, London, 1952
The Sceptical Occultist, Terry White, Century, London, 1994
The Supernatural A-Z, James Randi, Headline Books, London, 1995
The Thunder of Justice, Ted and Maureen Flynn, MAXCOL, Vancouver, 1993
The Turin Shroud is Genuine, Rodney Hoare, Souvenir Press, London, 1998 Twenty
Questions about Medjugorje Kevin Orlin Johnson Ph.D, Pangaeus, Dallas, 1999
The Two Divine Promises, Fr Roman Hoppe, TAN, Illinois, 1987
The Virgin of the Poor, Damian Walne and Joan Flory, CTS, London, 1983
The Way of Divine Love, Sr Josefa Mendenez, TAN, Illinois, 1980
The Wonder of Guadalupe, Francis Johnson, Augustine, Devon, 1981
To the Priests, Our Lady’s Beloved Sons, Fr Gobbi, The Marian Movement of
Priests, St Paul’s Press, Athlone, 1991
THE WEB
The Most Dangerous False Apparition in the World
www.unitypublishing.com/Apparitions/Garabandal2.html