Secularism and its implied criticism of religion
To be a secularist, that is a person who advocates that religious doctrine be
kept out of political decision making, is to challenge and criticise religion at
least indirectly. Each religion claims to be set up by God to help people reach
their zenith. Thus if the state does not endorse that religion it is doing harm
indirectly.
Christians and secularists are at war. The reason for the war all comes down to
something very simple. Christians say God's wishes come first and secularism
ignores God.
Christians claim that God created them and revealed their religion. Secularists
claim that Christians created their version of God and their religion. The
Christians say that they are right for God told them what is right and he knows
best. The secularists are saying that Christians are inventing their faith and
should not be permitted to enforce their religious ideas on society not even
legally.
Secularism should listen to religion but as one thing among many things that
should be given a hearing. Secularism is not perfect and nobody should claim
that it is. But to try and judge what should be allowed or not allowed without
the input of religious prejudices and taboos is better than letting religions
rule the day with all their different rules and lies and infighting and
confusion. For example, if a secularist has to work out if contraception is good
or bad or neutral, he or she should do it on earthly grounds and not be worrying
about the command of a God or religion requiring her or him to forbid
contraception simply on the basis of authority. Nothing will get done if we
start complicating things with religion. It is not intolerance but necessity
that requires the secular voice to be the loud voice and the voice that is
heard. We need to forget about God and religious taboos and work out what is
best for society. We need to challenge and criticise them. We need to advance
secularism.