WHY IS SEX SEEN AS SELF-GIVING AS IF NOTHING ELSE IS?
Catholic doctrine gets narrow. You are your body. You don't have a body. You are a body. So all giving of yourself is giving yourself. But because the Church wants to come up with ideas such as that its a sort of lie to have sex with somebody you are not married to. It says your body says that you give yourself even if it means a new life, a child will result, when you have sex.
A lot of things could be interpreted as the language of self-giving not just
sex. When you give your time and your body and yourself to work for an employer
you are giving yourself. If sex means you are giving yourself this means it even
more for work can be worse than marriage and you can’t have a marriage without
work and money.
The Church allows you to remarry if your spouse dies. If sex implies the
legitimacy of the extreme and puritanical self-giving misery that the Church
wants for those who have sex then it is clear that if a man has sex with his
wife and she dies he should never marry again because in the body-language of
sex he gave his entire self to his dead wife. “But she is dead”, you might say.
But that is not the point. She could be nearly completely brain dead and the man
wouldn’t be allowed another chance for there is still life in her. But the point
is, he gave her himself absolutely to the exclusion of all others. He gave her
the most valuable thing he had: himself indicating complete sacrifice. This
implicitly means that he cannot legitimately remarry if she dies!
It is tragic that even some people who disagree with the Church on contraception
still praise the ideals behind the Church’s thinking. This is worrying because
such neurotic and unnatural self-sacrifice could never be praiseworthy.
To claim as the Church does, that contracepting sex is a lie is to accuse all
who use it of bad faith. But Catholics may object that they do not judge. When
they say that, they mean they judge the act not the person who commits it. So
they are accusing them of lying for only persons can lie. Nobody could possibly
agree that people have a right to lie to one another through sex so logically it
is quite right for the Catholic Church to manipulate the law of the land to
outlaw contraception just like it did in Ireland until recently. It would imply
that a wife has a duty to separate from her husband on the grounds that he can’t
be trusted if he has a stronger belief in contraception than she has or if he
wants contraception to be used. Then to say we must be tolerant about
contraception is to say we must be tolerant and accepting of people who lie to
us which makes a laughing stock of belief in right and wrong.
The Church says that artificial birth control is evil for it is unnatural. But
so are glasses and clothes. She says that Jesus was born unnaturally from a
virgin. The Church then responds that birth control is an unnatural sin and is
not like wearing glasses for you wear glasses for there is something wrong with
you but birth control is for preventing things from working as they should. But
when nature makes your body want sex when it is not the time to have a child
there is something wrong with you and you need the contraception. Why isn’t it
an unnatural sin to wear glasses when you don’t need to, say when you are just
pottering round the house? We come before nature so we have to go against it all
the time to live.
It is against natural law to cut your finger nails. It is against nature to cut
your throat. The Church says that the first is neither immoral or moral. It says
the second is immoral. It may be forced to admit that something cannot be
condemned as morally wrong just because it is against physical nature. So if it
wants to condemn birth control it has to argue that it is an unnatural sin on
the basis that it is natural law to exercise some self-control. This idea denies
that sexual love in marriage is good. It can't be that loving when it needs to
be controlled. If the sex is loving then the more sex the better.
The failing to cut your finger nails and keep them tidy can indicate disrespect
for yourself and those who see them. The Church lies in making it neither
immoral or moral.
Even if birth control were a sin, there is no justification or reason in the
insistence of the Church that it is as bad as murder and you will go to Hell
forever if you die unrepentant of the sin of birth control just like you would
for murder. The stance of the Church is extremism and bigotry. The Church could
teach that it is venial sin - this is sin that you have to pay for by suffering
in Purgatory not a sin so serious that you would suffer punishment for it that
never ends and which can never end.
Natural family planning treats your fertility as if it were something bad or
dangerous which is why it lets the couple have sex when the fertility is out of
the way. It has that in common with contraception. The Church again is
condemning contraception though natural family planning should be condemned too.
You cannot condemn birth control for being unnatural for we have to go against
nature all the time to live. Potatoes are for growing. Stones are for lying
about and not for making into houses. Those who say that birth control is evil
because it is unnatural are stating that natural law is more important than
human welfare. We come first.
The Church says that birth control makes men use women for their own pleasure
and presumably it makes women use men for pleasure too. So, she wants men to use
women to have unwanted children instead. It is worse to treat a woman as a
baby-making machine than as a sex object. Nothing makes men use women – they
don’t have to have this manipulative attitude. So the Church is partly
forbidding birth control because it is abused that that is unfair. When the
Church allows barren couples some of whom wouldn’t want children anyway to have
sex it is impossible to see how it can argue that sterilised couples are abusing
one another when they are having sex.
The Church says that artificial birth control leads to abortion and that makes
birth control and even indirectly murderous. The pope, who has to know from his
philosophy and training in logic and from his critics that he is wrong, sees the
fight against abortion and birth control as one and the same battle. They
obviously are not. Birth-control using barrier methods does not mean abortion
will be more likely if they fail for you are trying to prevent conception and
that does not mean you would want to get rid of a baby if you get pregnant.
Birth-control using pills which prevent the embryo implanting should not lead to
abortion either if they fail. Why? Because there is a difference between killing
some cells by a birth control pill and killing an embryo that is more advanced.
Many people who would not have an abortion use the pill. At this point the
Church will use statistics to back up her allegations. But no matter what the
statistics say it is not the fault of belief in birth-control if people using it
will be more inclined to abortion. There would have to be another explanation
for the figures. And there are many statistics from research organisations that
give a totally different picture from the one the Church wants to give. If
people were more careful abortion would not be necessary. People are going to
have sex anyway and not allowing them to use contraception is forcing them to
use abortion for they will panic if conception results. There would be more
abortions and regrets without it. Even if there isn’t there shouldn’t be and it
is still right to encourage contraception for you can’t ban things just because
people misuse them. The rates of misuse fall and climb all the time anyway so
you can’t determine morality by looking at the rates.
Using the safe period will lead to abortion the woman does not want but which
she will have out of desperation for it is only permitted to be used for grave
reasons meaning that if it fails the woman will panic. It should lead to
abortion and it does. The fear the woman will feel while using it can only be
alleviated by intending to use abortion to rectify the situation. She must
secretly intend to abort for there is no other way she can cope.
Some Catholics assert that birth control makes people see the children they have
a result of its failure as unfortunate accidents. But seeing children that way
would be the fault of the parents and not of contraception. The children would
be accidents but once the pregnancies are discovered the parents would start to
love and accept the children. They should think that the child is a fortunate
accident who was born at the wrong time but who is still welcome. If people
really believe that birth control degrades children then they should never allow
it and should make the pope oppose the natural method. The natural method is
allowed to fail a bit. After all, it is supposed to be open to life should God
so will to create life. Anybody trying to avoid children even by contraception
could resolve to welcome any baby that comes as a result of the contraception
failing.
It is feared by opponents of artificial birth control that it will lead to
people losing restraint in sexual matters. God is supposed to help you fight
temptation so don’t blame birth control. It is true that a person might use
contraception to have sex whenever and with whoever he or she wants but that
would be abusing contraception. You cannot condemn anything because it is
abused. Why don’t they complain to God that some people who are not suited to
partners have huge sex drives?
The Church says that birth control loosens the marriage bond – it makes partners
less afraid of going to bed with someone else. But what about the fact that the
Church says that Jesus is there to keep marriage together so he can handle that
possibility? And when people can do lots of things in bed besides intercourse we
see the silliness of the allegation. If there were no contraception there might
be loads of married people having oral sex with their extra-marital lovers. If
that became the norm and it could, there would be more cheating than there would
be with contraception being common. The Church does not condemn oral sex and
masturbation and anal sex with the vehemence and vigour that it uses against
contraception. They pick on the one sexual sin, contraception. Nobody dies from
oral sex or anal sex or masturbation. But people do die from there been no
contraception or not using it properly. How warped is this Church?
So the Church wants people to be scared of pregnancy and disease to put them off
having forbidden sex. The Church wants people to be afraid to break God’s law,
nice. People should do right because they want to and not because pregnancy or
something else scares them. What if women use the natural method to have more
lovers? They could.
If contraception were used properly and enhanced marriage and prevented disease
the Church would still forbid it. Yet it has the nerve to try and cite the
failure of contraception at times to prevent pregnancy and to prevent disease to
scare people off using it or allowing it or advising it!
It is said that contraception makes illicit sex more likely but the fact is that
the fear of pregnancy does not always stop sex happening. The Church believes
that sex should be genital to genital and that oral sex and other things are
perversions. It prefers unprotected vaginal sex to oral sex for the latter is
“unnatural”. If the Church does not want such “perversion” then why does it
force it to happen by banning birth control?
The Church says that pregnancy should be avoided out of the love of God and not
out of the fear of pregnancy or what comes after so it cannot forbid birth
control on the grounds of deterring people. God only wants what is done for his
own sake.
Religious morality only leads to lies and unfairness. Catholicism tries to turn people against the pill with arguments such as what follows. "The pill causes havoc with a woman's body. It could damage her fertility forever. It kills any baby she conceives by preventing implantation. It increases the risk of breast cancer." This conniving cult purposely ignores the fact that there are risks with everything we do. If Catholicism was not trying to manipulate women and society to turn against the pill it would condemn driving a car with a petrol engine and would certainly condemn smoking which does far more harm than the pill ever could. In reality the reasons given have nothing to do with Catholicism banning birth control at all. It is because they won't admit that their faith is wrong. They are trying to make it seem that they prohibit because they care. They are insecure about the reasons for their prohibiting and so they have to use subterfuge.
Is the fact that if you can control people’s sexuality you can control them in all things, the real reason why the Church bans birth control? The fact that Roman Catholicism allows people who cannot have children to wed says the answer is yes. It does not tell barren or old couples to refrain from sex except when the urge is uncontrollable and may result in adultery as St Augustine would have done.
The Church doesn't mind sex within and babies resulting in a marriage which may not last or one that WILL not last even when the husband and wife know it. It pretends to care.