PROPHECY REFUTES THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS
The Christian Church teaches that Jesus died on the cross and rose again three
days later leaving his tomb empty and then for a while he appeared to his
followers. It says the resurrection fulfilled Old Testament predictions made by
God through the prophets and Jesus’ own predictions that he would rise again. To
defend this idea, the Church uses the Old and New Testaments in the Bible.
As people came back from the dead such as
Lazarus, we wonder what is so special about Jesus making a comeback.
Religion answers that they died again and he remained alive.
The conundrum is how it is claimed there is evidence that Jesus
rose. But there is none that he really is now immortal.
If you can establish that Jesus rose to life you cannot establish
that he didn't die after. So there is no point in it all.
The missing tomb and the visions are just trying to appeal to
people's superstitious nature.
When somebody makes a prophecy, the principle thing is showing that it
definitely was made before the event it predicted. There is no such assurance
with the prophecies Jesus made about his rising. Not a single Old Testament
prophecy can be proven to have been made before the event. The evidence for
example that Daniel was written when it pretends to have been is lacking and is
too open to interpretation. It shows clear examples of prophecies written down
after the event - that is, cheating. That Jesus was going to depend on Old
Testament lies and unreliable faith forgers says a lot about him.
In Luke 24 Jesus did not say “I am the Son of God and his prophet because I have
risen from the dead and been seen”, but said that he was to rise for the law and
the prophets said it and the prophets’ words verified the resurrection. The
function of the witnesses is to say that the prophets have been fulfilled with
regard to the resurrection more than to say that the resurrection happened but
they were only allowed to believe in the resurrection because they saw it
predicted (Luke 24:45-48).
Christians never worry about the fact that Jesus lied. The law and the prophets
never mentioned the rising of the Messiah or of Jesus. The Old Testament
prophecies of the resurrection are said to be ambiguous at best and are too
scarce of detail to give us confidence in Christ. We never know if they mean
recovering from serious life threatening illness or a resurrection. Or so we are
told. But the most natural interpretation is that they refer to getting better
from life endangering illness. So we do know. Far fetched interpretations of a
text are fantasies not interpretations.
In the Dives and Lazarus parable, Jesus teaches that even a resurrection to warn
about Hell will not convince those who will not listen to the prophets and the
Law of Moses. This puts his own resurrection below the prophets in importance.
If the prophets did not prophesy a resurrection then it never happened. We have
Jesus’ word for it.
In Matthew 22, Jesus was asked by the Jews that if seven men marry the same
woman whose wife she will be in the resurrection. "But Jesus answered and said
to them, 'You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures nor the power of
God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but
are like angels in heaven.'" The claim is that the Scriptures answer the
question - they do not for they do not mention the resurrection as connected to
marriage. And the power of God has nothing to do with it. God could be as
powerful if a woman is married to her first husband or to none of the husbands.
Jesus was anxious about lying about resurrection texts wasn't he? The same story
appears in Mark the oldest and most credible gospel so if Mark is largely
historical then Jesus was truly a liar.
Jesus stressed prophecy as his credential and said that his resurrection would
only be a credential for him if it were prophesied. But his prophecies of the
resurrection could have been written after the event. Even if Jesus fitted all
the other prophecies the fact that the major one was not there and he thought it
was would prove that he was not the subject of the prophecies at all. Only a
false prophet makes mistakes like that for there is no point in making
prophecies if the subject of the prophecies who has to show that they are
fulfilled misinterprets, for he would only be the subject if he were a prophet
himself and able to see what the prophets meant.
The New Testament is telling us that prophecy is the supreme proof. But Jesus
failed to prophesy his own resurrection in a convincing way! This points to him
being a hoaxer, or if you like a hoaxer who got the assistance of the Devil, or
to the gospellers being liars. Christianity is not based on faith but
self-deception.
THE "PROPHESIED" RESURRECTION
Jesus thought that Isaiah 53 was a prophecy of him. It said that the servant of
God would make his grave with the bad people and the rich in his two deaths
according to the strict translation (page 198, The Passover Plot). This suggests
that Jesus had to die for a minute on the cross and then die permanently later.
Jesus could have planned to survive the crucifixion on the basis of this text.
Jesus said of his body that it was the Temple he would
destroy and raise up in three days. This analogy looks like Jesus is saying his
body would be burnt to ashes or something and be completely restored for the
Temple would be turned into a heap of stones. All the gospels say that this
never happened to Jesus though perhaps the John gospel is hinting that Jesus was
removed from the tomb and cremated and it forgets this later. If destroyed just
means being made lifeless Jesus is not saying he will be restored to life on the
third day. He says he will rebuild in three days so it could be a gradual
process with him being alive all the time. In other words, he is rejuvenating
after severe bodily trauma and injury. He told the apostles that he would rise
in three days from the dead and Peter and the apostles knew what he meant
(Matthew 16). His friends would have taken his body from the tomb in case he
would rise and be killed again.
Jesus said that the Father loves him for dying and rising
and then that nobody can take his life from him (John 10). His life was taken
from him at the crucifixion. Christians say he used the killers to kill him so
that it was not they who were taking his life. Interpretations like that make
words useless. Take the plain sense. And the Bible does not say that God has
that much control over free will. Is Jesus saying he will not die at all?
In the first three gospels, Jesus clearly predicts in
detail what is going to happen to him and that he will be crucified etc.
Obviously, the prophecies were written after the event for the gospels were.
If it were any other book that was doing this the
Christians would be saying the prophecies were fraudulent. The verses that say
the apostles forgot he said this say as much for they would not have forgotten
that so the fact that Jesus never said it was disguised with the excuse that
they had bad memories.
Deuteronomy 18 says that even if a prophet gives lots of
correct revelations and one is in error the prophet must be entirely rejected.
This implies that prophecy and not miracle is the test of a true prophet. Jesus
did not provably declare his resurrection before it happened. If there had been
anything supernatural happening in this we would we reading this in Isaiah or
Jeremiah or somewhere, “And in many years from now, there shall be one that
shall open his arms in death and he shall be carried from the high place of
death. And where his remains will lie they will lie for a few days and then they
shall not be there and he shall appear and he shall announce his resurrection
from the dead.” This is vague enough and yet clear enough. It mixes the right
level of obscurity with the right level of detail unlike the prophecies Jesus
depended on which have too many possible meanings. Only a false prophet gives
false proofs for his mission. Jesus stands condemned by Deuteronomy 18. He
didn’t even try to pass the test. His prophecy about the destruction of
Jerusalem was based on the Old Testament habit of predicting destruction for
Jerusalem if it did not obey God and he thought it was apostate so it had
nothing to do with seeing the future and everything with religious prejudice.
And besides, the rest of his prophecies haven’t happened yet. What right has a
man to claim to be a prophet who should be obeyed by the people when his
prophecies are not all fulfilled yet?
After the resurrection, Peter lied to a gullible crowd
about Psalm 16 that said that God will not abandon his beloved to decay saying
it was a prophecy of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. It only says that someone
will be saved from death. It is too vague to read a resurrection into it and
there is no need to. Remember, stick to the simplest interpretation. Jesus
certainly agreed with this interpretation for he said that his resurrection was
forecasted and there was nothing else in the Old Testament that came close to
predicting it. But if it is a real prophecy then it supports the idea that Jesus
survived death by crucifixion and was nursed back to health not that he rose
again.
THE SIGN OF JONAH
When Lazarus dies and gets buried Jesus waits for four days before going to the tomb to raise him up. Jesus admits beforehand that his behaviour is about a plan to glorify God. If it is correct that his religion thought a dead body is alive three days after it dies for the soul is still there then Jesus had a reason to wait until day four. It was to be sure that Lazarus was really and properly dead to raise him up. Trouble is it means that Jesus is denying his own resurrection which happened in less than three days is a real resurrection or miracle!
In Matthew 12, after Jesus cast out a devil and chastised
the Jewish leaders for saying it was the Devil did it he thought he had proven
to them he could do miracles for and by God. Then they asked him for a sign and
he replied that this evil age looks for a sign but will get none but that of
Jonah. Just like Jonah was in the belly of the whale for three days and three
nights (Jonah 2:1) so Jesus said he would be inside the earth. He means that he
will rise again. This is the only place where he talks like this.
In Luke 11 he tells the crowd that the evil age seeks a sign but will get only the sign of Jonah for Jesus will be to the people what Jonah, the prophet of repentance, was to Nineveh. Then he preaches that he means calling the people to repentance. Either this is additional stuff and is not parallel to Matthew or it is Luke changing what Matthew wrote for he did not like it. But it is the Matthew version that is important. In it Jesus says that the only miracle he will do will be to raise himself from the dead. The other signs Jesus does will not be as convincing because they will be and have been done in private but this one will be done in public and nobody will be able to refute it. Or it could mean that the miracles all except his own resurrection will be real miracles, the rest are indeed signs but only natural signs worked by God and so are not miracles. The ambiguity is important because it means the Christians cannot be sure if they were miracles. Scholars have found that the Christians misinterpret the Gospels and see miracle stories where none were perhaps intended.
Jonah was literally three days and three nights in the
whale. Jesus said he would literally do the same when he compared himself to
Jonah and indicated that Jonah pictured him. Christians say that Jesus was only
doing what we all do using the words for three days and nights non-literally
like we would say we did a day’s work when we only worked seven hours. But then
why did he use the word nights? Days would have done and suited a non-literal
meaning better. Nights is an emphasis on the literalism. And prophets cannot
afford to confuse. The Christians are just trying to make the prophecy fit
Matthew’s belief that Jesus was buried part of Friday and all of Saturday and
part of Sunday two nights in the grave. And also, his listeners heard him make a
prediction and saw no reason to take him other than literally. So Jesus intended
for them to take him literally. But he was only part of Friday, all of Saturday
and part of Sunday night in the tomb. He was a false prophet according to the
Law of Moses and that was enough to prove that the resurrection was a fake. It
is interesting that he says he will be deep inside the earth which may suggest
that he was to be buried in the ground inside the tomb which could have been why
the body was thought missing and then when the fuss started Joseph came and
secretly took it away when nobody was about. This is assuming the guards
were going to come and have the floor dug. It was a crime scene.
Conclusion
The evidence is that the New Testament lied that Jesus’ resurrection was
predicted. The fact that the New Testament depended on misquoted and
distorted sources to establish that Jesus rose proves that he did not.