MIRACLES BELIEVERS DON'T REALLY RESPECT MIRACLES FOR THEY PICK WHAT ONES THEY WANT TO BELIEVE IN
Despite claiming that miracles are signs to show what doctrines are true,
religionists just pick the miracles they want to believe and discard those they
don’t.
A religion that has some verified miracles and rejects ones that are just as
credible would fake miracles and so we could not believe in any of its miracles.
The Church says that it rejects silly miracles such as bricks floating in
mid-air – another proof of its double-standards in relation to miracles. But
when you think about it miracles of healing are just as strange. When miracles
are just signs it does not matter what form they take. Apparitions are an
example of a miracle that is just for sign purposes only.
Catholics will assert that they believe that Mary appeared to Bernadette in
Lourdes and that this was a sign from God that their religion is true ignoring
other miracle claims such as that of spontaneous human combustion and ghosts and
UFOs which have no Catholic or indeed religious connotations and which are
better substantiated by the sheer volume of claimants.
Religionists often pick out some of their own miracles for belief and are
agnostic about the rest. The Catholic Church does not accept every miracle it
examines even if it is as good as the ones it has accepted. It is always rather
hostile to all miracles at first. Even Lourdes was opposed at the start.
All the Church manuals say that any apparition that does not agree with official
and orthodox Catholic doctrine, is not from God. The Roman Catholic Church only
investigates miracles that suit its doctrines. If I saw the Virgin Mary today
and she did 500 unmistakeable miracles of healing through me to back up my
testimony that I saw her, the Church would not investigate but would throw out
the miracles if she told me the pope was not the head of the Church on earth. If
she found a way to persuade me that I misunderstood the Virgin or to persuade
others that I did she might investigate then and hijack the miracles as evidence
for herself and say they are really from God. To say that evidence backs you up
when you are manipulating that evidence is clearly one thing: fraud. The
Catholic Church and all its clergy is guilty of gross fraud. That is the fruit
that miracles produce, all this deception and exploitation. That is what the
Church collects money to build shrines and publish holy books for: lies. This is
very serious.
The greatest minds in history disagree over exactly what right and wrong are.
Even today people have to agree to disagree. Ordinary people are bad at working
out right and wrong and don’t have the time to think. When Jesus indicated that
you can tell true prophets by their holy and beneficial fruits he was telling
you to arrogantly act as if you know it all about right and wrong! This shows
that he was condemned by his own standard as a prophet from Satan because he was
trying to create the bad fruit of arrogance and bigotry. And he gave this advice
to people who knew less than what people today know. For example, his hearers
believed it was right to force a woman to marry you, to sell your daughter into
slavery, and to kill homosexuals. By modern standards, Moses was a fake prophet
for he said God gave him many laws and we find most of these laws savage and
harsh and barbaric. There is no point in banning hate if you are going to allow
evil like that in the name of love. Moses was a false prophet and so was Jesus
for Jesus regarded him as a true prophet and a forerunner.
The Christian faith says that faith is not natural. You need the light of the
Holy Spirit to help you see the faith is true so that you can believe in it. So
Christians believe not because of miracles or anything but because they think
the Spirit has made them see stuff as true. That totally eliminates the need for
miracles and shows that whatever is doing them is not God. Miracles that say
they approve of the Christian faith are attempting to trick for they are
approving of a subjective standard of truth which is not a standard at all but a
caricature. I mean the Seventh-Day Adventist, the Mormon and the Catholic all
have theologies that contradict each other in several important matters and yet
they all swear that the Holy Spirit has been making them see that their faith is
true. Worse they all have periods of doubt and unbelief when they wonder if the
Spirit is telling them something different. When miracles leave it up to your
feelings and insights that you think are coming from God to decide if the faith
is true they are not signs for it can’t be a problem if you think there is no
Spirit communicating with you and you decide not to believe. When the miracle is
just about you asking yourself what you think or don’t think the Spirit is
saying then it is only a waste of time for the Church to authenticate or refute
a miracle for it is not important if a miracle has really happened or not. All
that matters is that it looks like a miracle happened. Miracles are encouraging
chaos and division by encouraging you to elevate your imagination as a vehicle
of divine revelation. That can’t produce faith. It can only produce
self-deception and the deliberate blinding of yourself to the truth. Miracles
are not signs. Claiming inspiration from the Spirit is pride. It is occult as
well for you would need to be a psychic god to know it was the Spirit. This
stuff about faith being supernatural insight that is mostly God’s work is really
a plot to stop you thinking for yourself. If it is up to you, you can think what
you like but if God is inspiring you then you are a bad evil person destined for
Hell if you don’t go along with what he is inspiring and believe. So it puts
pressure on you to obey the pope and the Church or Jesus and the Bible. It
advocates and employs conditioning while pretending that it is not conditioning
that makes you believe but God.
The subjective basis of faith makes faith an idol. If your reason brings you to
God that is better than your emotions and imagination doing it for they can’t
tell you what you should or shouldn’t do. Reason cares about what is real. A God
who limits or opposes reason hates himself and wants to be abused.
You need to have the Spirit inspiring you to see that the fruits of religion are
good or really good. So the fruits are no good when the resultant faith is
subjective and therefore bigoted. They depend on an evil principle that defiles
them and makes them fly catchers rather than really good fruits. To use the
fruits argument is to deceive yourself and others and to boast that you know
more than you can.
The fruits of miracles would seem to be one way to avoid just arbitrarily
picking some miracles as worthy of belief and not others. You could reject
miracles with bad fruits as not being from God and accept the ones with good
fruits. Since the Catholic faith claims to come from one source, God, that means
miracles will encourage you to accept the entire faith. But what Catholics do is
continue to scratch the surface of the faith. They do not make sure they like
this faith in its entirety. Very few Catholics know the faith properly and have
the right perceptions of its doctrines. The nastier doctrines either don’t sink
in and are sometimes treated as taboo in the Church to pull the wool over the
eyes of members for being too out of fashion or vicious would drive them away –
for example, I’d say only one in a thousand Catholics knows that the Church
considers oral sex in marriage to be a sin. This is just as bad as the lukewarm
attitude that Jesus said he would spew the Christians who had it right out of
his mouth for. Their enthusiasm then would be the fruit of irresponsibility and
ignorance mixed with a little honesty and would be keeping them away from the
full truth of God and not bringing them towards it. So miracles then in this
context have bad fruits that look good. They must be the Devil’s work or
illusions or lies or all three. It also means that the priesthood is thieving
off people by taking their money for they don’t fully know what they are paying
for and are encouraged to think they do. It was because teachers in religion,
including parents and clergy, have such a hard job and have to teach so much
that James the apostle said it was a bad idea for too many to become teachers
for their job was a danger to them for they would be called to a very strict
account before God (James 3:1,2).
The truth about the fruits is that it is not the fruits of any individual
miracle that count as much as the fruits of belief in the possibility and
reality of miracles itself. To say the fruits of a miracle are important is to
say the concept of miracle is more important for you have to see that miracles
are possible before you can adjudge their fruits. So any miracle, be it from God
or Satan, is causing people to adopt miracles as something that can happen. The
fruits of belief in miracle then has been the vast majority of believers in
miracle led astray by false miracles. Buddhism, Hinduism, Mormonism, Judaism,
Islam, Paganism and Satanism have all reported undeniable miracles. So a miracle
of healing having good fruits means nothing when the very concept of miracles
has led to nothing but error, superstition and crime.
The Church would answer this problem as follows: “People are going to believe in
miracles whether they happen or not so God might as well encourage belief in
miracles”. Obviously, that is all they can say. But if people are going to
believe anyway and God does no miracles then surely it is not God’s fault. To
ascribe any miracles to God is saying it is his fault and that he is bad news
and causing trouble on purpose.
No apparition or miracle is from God at all because the Church cannot and does
not check out the fruits thoroughly. But it could check the fruits out better
but it does not. This makes it a bad fruit to believe in any apparition!! It
must be a sin to seek apparitions for everybody looks for fruit in the visionary
so the visionary is asking to be put up on a pedestal as an example of humility
and prayerfulness which Jesus strictly forbade which makes one wonder if the
apostles made the resurrection appearances of Jesus up. Jesus had stated that if
you are going to pray do it in private and close the door so nobody knows.
Anybody who can have their life examined by the Church and maybe proclaimed a
saint is obviously a sinner for breaking this commandment. They are not a saint
at all. If they had been they would have hidden their inner life from others to
perfection and would have come across just as a sinner no better than anybody
else who was trying to make it to God.
To say you have had an apparition is to say good fruits will appear in your
life. It is a boast. It is the sin of presumption. No wonder St John of the
Cross said the danger of pride made it best to have no visions at all. Most
visionaries and recipients of miracles are not that saintly before they have
their experience – the Medjugorje visionaries were totally normal guys and gals
like Jesus’ apostles – which shows that God doesn’t have the sense to choose
saints to have visions so that we can be a bit more sure they are not going to
be captivated by pride.
The Devil might tell a person how to pull off the perfect miracle hoax for why
would he do miracles and waste his power for a religion that is so dishonest
that it treats evidence like putty? It can do the hard work for him.
We conclude that miracle believers are misled by making the topic too simple. Every miracle has an equal that says it is false. If the evidence says Jesus rose then how do we know it says it? We can't use evidence to help us. A miracle could simulate a miracle resurrection. Or a miracle could possess a lookalike to pretend to be him. Even if Jesus did rise, there is no evidence that he was able to appear and the apparitions were his. So you may have a before and after a claimed miracle but you will never know or be able to guess what the exact miracle was.