MIRACLES AND THE NOTION THAT EVIL IS A NEGATION
Religion says God does miracles. These are supernatural deeds that God does as
signs. They are taken as evidence that God is communicating with us.
Religion says God does not make evil. He makes only good and any evil that
happens is a falling short of good. In order to believe in God and get comfort,
religious people water down evil and the horrors of depression etc.
If evil is merely abused good then it is a sin to see it as seriously bad. How
could it be if it is made of good that is just in the wrong context? In fact,
seeing it as vile and seriously bad would be the nearest you can get to turning
evil into a power and an abomination. So if nothing is that bad then why do you
encourage faith in miracles and why do you commit yourself to supernatural
notions and religions based on them? People who do that invariably are motivated
by the thought that evil and good supernatural powers are in combat. The miracle
from God encourages them and invites them to participate in the battle against
evil spirits. A battle is a battle and it is hardly a nice thing to think you
are at war with magical forces that may not even exist!
The notion of evil being the lack of good destroys the value of miracles as
evidence for the existence of God. Why? Because the notion is evil so if God
does miracles to promote belief in his existence it is part of the deal.
Therefore he is evil. And if evil is a real power and not a mere lack of good
God must have made evil and so we cannot trust him. We cannot trust what he
tries to say through miracles. At least the notion of evil being watered down to
appear as a lack is not all bad then! It leaves us with no evidence that God
exists for miracles do not count. It makes atheists of us in the sense that we
cannot be believers in God when there is no evidence.
If evil is just good that is in the wrong place and time it is easy to become
blind and see only the good. It is easy to mistake evil for good. Telling a real
miracle from God and one that is a trick or from Satan should then be impossible
in many cases and near-impossible in the rest.
Why not define a miracle as the absence of the natural? Why not define the
natural as the absence of the supernatural? This cannot be done for God is said
to be the one that keeps all things in existence meaning everything is
supernatural. The natural only looks non-supernatural. So everything is a
miracle! God trying to make special miracles only obscures this truth - if truth
is what it is! If the miracle down the right is a bad thing, the infinite
miracle of creation is off the scale bad!
Imagine a good dentist has healing powers. He could heal your agonising and
rotting tooth problem by a miracle. He would be wholly good in doing so. The
dentist who has the power but who chooses to pull your tooth out is a dentist
who is using evil to do good. The view that God isn't evil for letting evil
happen for it's not real, refuses to admit that God not helping my tooth with a
miracle means God is evil. It tries to say that if God permits evil for a
greater purpose that this evil is not a real thing so God is not even slightly
evil for using evil to produce good. It tries to say that God is not making evil
power to assist him in producing good for evil is just good that is in the wrong
place. So God is wholly good in his purposes. So he is as perfect as the miracle
dentist. But it doesn't work. No matter what evil is, it is still there. It is
still used. God is still using good in the wrong place to make good. He is still
using wrong to make good so he might as well make and use evil understood as a
power not a negation to do it.
So we have looked at the view that evil is unreal and a negative and not a
reality. It is a vicious view. If miracles lead to God they lead to that evil
view. Faith in God is evil in principle and often in practice. If miracles
invite and enhance and ground that faith they are abominations.