BEING A DARWINIAN BUT NOT IN POLITICS
From God Created Humanism: The Christian basis of secular values by Theo Hobson:
In the introduction to a collection of essays in 2003, he explains that he advocates Darwinism as a scientist only:
‘I am a passionate anti-Darwinian when it comes to politics and how we should
conduct our human affairs.’ A contradiction? No, he insists: There is no
inconsistency in favouring Darwinism as an academic scientist while opposing it
as a human being . . . For good Darwinian reasons, evolution gave us a brain
whose size increased to the point where it became capable of understanding its
own provenance, of deploring the moral implications and of fighting against
them. The first sentence is unobjectionable: one can affirm Darwinism as the key
to biology but also insist that it is no guide to meaning and morality, which
have other sources. But then, in the second sentence, he implies something else:
that we have evolved to be able to see that defying natural selection is our
moral duty. Soon he repeats the claim, telling us that evolution may not have
made us the fastest or strongest creatures, but it has given humans the ‘biggest
gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave
us all existence; the gift of revulsion against its implications’. Here is
a strong claim that the moral instinct is a product of evolution. To say that
evolution has given us the ability to understand this ‘cruel process’ claims too
much, for in reality evolution has no discernible role in our tendency to judge
this process as cruel.
COMMENT: It should be that there is no inconsistency in saying Darwinism is
right as a scientist while IGNORING it as a social being. Darwinism allows for
this and demands it for the fittest are fitter the more they co-operate. Secular
humanism sees evolution in realistic terms. We are not an evolution for we are
bad for this world and have ruined it through climate change. Evolution does not
mean things are getting better but only that complex things have organised and
survived to this point. Evolution is not a force but a sum up of forces or
evolutions. It is plural. Each person is part of it in their own way.
There are as many evolutions as there are people or plants or animals or
whatever.
The reality is that if politics gets too dog eat dog you can only be the fittest or hope to be if you bite back as hard as you can. So it makes sense to avoid being Darwinist as a social being but only if things are not that vicious.