Principle and its importance
A principle is about values as in love, compassion, humility and justice etc or
even hate, arrogance and cruelty etc. A good principle is embracing good values
and a bad principle is not.
If you are motivated by bad principles and make it look like you are good and
caring then you are lying to others. You should not be trusted.
The fact that people with harmful doctrines (such as the
Bible doctrine that God as master of life has the right to order us to kill) may
never put them into practice only means they never had to. It is not grounds for
praise. Religion readily says that itself about philosophies such as atheism or
utilitarianism and it is right that bad teachings not being acted on does not
mean they should be tolerated. But that means we can say the same thing about it
- it teaches doctrines that would harm and which are to be abhorred even if they
never get into a position where they do a lot of damage. You are not a good
person but a hypocrite if you will not condemn something bad and wait until it
does harm.
People can be on opposite sides and you might think they have opposite
moralities. But in fact both sides can have adopted the same moral
principles but disagree on how to use the principles. For example, the
pro-abortion person and the pro-life person both agree that killing babies in
the womb is wrong. It is just that the pro-abortion side is not convinced
abortion kills a person and the other side thinks it does. It is the method of
using the principles they have the disagreement over. It is important to be able
to discern good principles and you can only do that by testing the goodness of
your principles. The more people agree on what principles better the more we
learn and we learn together.
Too often today, people care more about what you do than what principles you
hold. If say religion/politics has bad principles, many people do not mind as
long as it gives them money and runs hospitals and schools for them and acts as
moral guardian.
With regard to the person who holds to an evil principle that seems to be not
put into practice -
#It is bad in itself. It is not called evil for nothing.
#It opens the door to getting practiced.
#Stops the person objecting if others practice it - if
they don’t want to be a hypocrite.
#Says something about the kind of person that is.
#It seems to do no harm at times. Remember a seems is not
good enough.
#It does do harm indirectly and in a non-obvious way.
#Calling it harmless empties the word evil of any
meaning. That is another evil principle!
#And if you have a dark principle, you cannot complain if
others have dark principles you don't like. It makes you a hypocrite if you
challenge somebody for doing evil. They do evil because they practice evil
principles.
#Bad principles lead to more bad principles and an
openness to many more.
Consider the statement: ”Moral principles are not relative but their application
is.” That looks like relativism. It would be if it meant you must believe that
love and justice and mercy are absolute values but you can invent how you apply
them. That would be a contradiction. Inventing say how to treat employees fairly
contradict the principle of justice. You cannot make it fair for a person with
billions to pay his accountant 1 cent per hour. Thus to say the application is
relative is to say the principle is relative. It is treating the principle as
relative as well. The principles may have to be applied differently according to
the best needs. But that is trying to base yourself on the facts and the
evidence not on mere opinion.
What if you hold to an evil principle that you cannot put into practice?
It is not about if the principle can be put into action or not. And do not
forget, that adopting a bad principle you cannot act upon is an act.
You are no better as a person than the person who has a bad principle that is
being or can be acted upon.
If the principle itself cannot be acted upon, it is still real. It is still your
principle and your mask will slip and lead to bad example for others.
A principle is about truth. Truth is not about you. Truth is truth no matter how
much you want it not to be. Once you oppose principles you become a lie. You
automatically make your life a lie and thus lie to others. To seek a middle
ground between the truth and the lie is to create a half-truth and a half-truth
is a half-lie. Morality is not on your side or anybody’s side. It is not
about sides. It is not even on God’s side. It is what it is. Your need for
painkillers does not mean they exist for you or anybody. They just exist. The
moral crusaders do think morality is on their side. That is what the notion of a
moral God and so on is really about. It is paradoxically immoral to think
morality is on your side. The reality is that morality can be bad for you. Moral
people often organise their lives to invent ways to stop that happening. They
keep away from any situation where they sniff a need for them to sacrifice
something big. They pay unskilled people to bandage the sick while they would
not do it themselves. Their prayers are pleas that others can make the
sacrifices.
Moral principle says if you have no idea of what is objectively moral or what it
means then it is objectively moral to make an attempt. You need objective
morality and the concept is forced on you even if you say morality is relative –
such a saying is unnatural and forced and warped. It is better to guess and live
the morality you have for errors will show up in time if it is wrong or needs
fixing. Guessing and testing is more important than grounding it or caring or
knowing why it is morally correct. Practicing what you understand to be
objective morality is a principle and the most foundational and important and
basic moral principle of all. If you have to guess the best guess is that
morality is about maintaining the well-being of others and yourself.
A good principle and a bad one are not opposites. The bad principle is bad not
because it is a lie but because it manipulates the truth and uses the truth to
make itself look sensible. Two extremes are not necessarily opposites.