THE "SIN" OF MASTURBATION
It is possible for many to masturbate to orgasm without thinking of sex. When
the mind is empty it cannot do any harm even if fantasy does. If fantasy does
harm, then all sex is wrong except strictly for the production of babies. But
there has to be something sexual there however slight to be able to reach the
orgasm. Christianity objects to sex not just because of the fantasy but also
because of the physical act. Sex would still be a sin if it were possible to
have it without any eroticism at all.
Solitary masturbation might be a sin because sexual activity is something that
you do with another person. Masturbation does not look very natural when it
involves organs that are for giving away to another person but nature is
unbalanced anyway so who gives a damn if it is natural or not?
In the past, it was thought that masturbation, under the euphemism of
self-abuse, could make you go blind or mad or make your palms hairy. All sorts
of lies were told to prevent people having some fun. It was obvious that
masturbation feels like sex and sex does not harm or cause unwanted pregnancy it
was safe and indeed safer than sex. Masturbation is almost universal and if
people did it more there would be fewer catching sexual transmitted disease. It
is better then sex for at least you are in full control. Mutual masturbation is
the best form of sexual activity for sex pleasure has a lot to do with mystery
and it still makes the other person’s body a mystery. The mystery can be
exciting.
The Church has to hold that masturbation is an unnatural sin which is the reason
it is immoral. So it would be more immoral than adultery for adultery is more
natural (page 461, Vicars of Christ). The Church might reply that adultery might
be more natural but it is anti-social and harmful which means it adds up to
being as vile as masturbation. But that is false for adultery need not be
harmful say when the transmission of disease is avoided and when it is totally
discreet. An adulterer who commits sins such as being careless with venereal
disease and who does not mind if his home is torn apart by his affairs is
committing two additional sins to adultery. They are not part of his sin of
adultery. Adultery is a sin on its own. That is why it is foolish to accept the
Church’s attempt to look sensible when it makes masturbation worse than
adultery. So this natural law morality garbage makes it better for a man to have
full unprotected sex with a woman carrying HIV than for him to just have oral
sex with her which reduces the risk of transmission. A rapist who wears a condom
is a bigger sinner than one who doesn’t (ibid, page 461). The Church is
embarrassed about these teachings which is why so few know about them. It should
tell them what it really thinks even if it drives them away. Honesty requires
that.
To say that masturbation is unnatural is to say it is wrong to make love to
yourself. So it is okay to do it to someone else in marriage meaning that
anything sexual outside of marriage is unnatural. The Church says that
masturbation is as sick and abnormal as sending flowers to yourself. Obviously
if the Church is right it would have to be. Sending flowers to yourself should
make you happy. So it is not the act that is bad or good but how it makes you
feel that determines that. If you feel bad about masturbation, you should
refrain from it until you learn to accept it as wholesome. It doesn’t but that
does not make it wrong to send the flowers to yourself in itself. The Church
says masturbation is wrong in itself meaning that its immorality has nothing to
do with your feelings. The implication is that masturbation is evil just because
it is masturbation. It is sinful just because the Church thinks it is unnatural.
What is natural matters more than what brings happiness as if happiness were an
unnatural sin! It is certainly unnatural to put rules before happiness.
The negativity of the Church towards masturbation shows that the Church opposes
self-esteem of masturbators. It is trying to make anybody who masturbates feel
bad about it and the benefits it gives. To attack the self-esteem of others over
something harmless or relatively harmless is intolerable.
By condemning masturbation and all those other harmless things or things which
can be made harmless the Church is claiming that it knows best. It should just
say it thinks it but not be so dogmatic.