CHRISTIAN HYPOCRISY ON TRANSPLANTS
The Catechism of the Catholic Church says, “Organ transplants are not morally
acceptable if the donor or those who legitimately speak for him have not given
their informed consent …It is morally inadmissible directly to bring about the
disabling mutilation or death of a human being, even in order to delay the death
of other persons” (entry 2296).
Many of us would see hypocrisy at this point and would think, “Obviously, it
would be a sin not to become a donor and donate as many organs as possible
despite this religious system says if life is what comes first. Life does come
first even if a person refuses to be a donor their organs should be taken. The
relatives should think of it as something good that has to be done.”
They would add: “The brain-dead person on life-support cannot speak for herself
or himself anymore. So we should take it for granted that if they knew what good
they could do they would consent even if they died defiant to the end when
requested to become organ donors. Their relatives cannot speak for them when for
all we know they could have changed their minds just before expiration. It is
none of the relatives’ business. But having said that this may be true it cannot
be put into practice. The burden of relatives and victims being afraid of organs
being taken without consent will outweigh any good done by just taking the
organs. It will in some cases make relatives unwilling to seek medical help in
the mistaken belief that the person is dying anyway and it is best to keep them
out of hospital. It is hypocrisy to allow killing in war and not enforced organ
donation. It is hypocrisy to accept that it is right to conscript young men and
send them to the battlefield against their will and to say that people should
not be put to death where their organs could save more lives.”
The same people could say, “When the homosexuals in America were found to have
had the AIDS virus in the early eighties, they should have been put to death to
stop them spreading the virus. They did spread it and now millions are dead with
millions more dying and suffering. It is better to kill homosexuals to stop AIDS
than to let them live and cause the deaths of many innocent children. Human life
may be totally valuable but it has to be sacrificed in the interest of
protecting more lives. People still may have to die so that more people will
live.”
The relatives would be right to put a stop to operating on persons who could
come round.
Very evil criminals should be killed to provide organs if it is true that we
have free will. An evil person should be sacrificed when the alternative is
killing a good person. This however is not capital punishment or degrading the
criminal. We reject this thinking for the evil person is a victim of nature and
it would be cruel to do that to a being that has no free will.