ETERNAL PUNISHING IS A DOCTRINE OF HATE
The Christian tradition says that if you die in serious sin or at loggerheads
with God you will lose him forever at death and have to go to Hell.
We do not fall for the claim that the teaching is merely a warning.
Passive aggressive abusers would say that anyway.
Why do Atheists consider the doctrine of Hell to be grossly evil and spiteful?
1) Because it asks me to approve if I am sent to Hell forever for my sins though
I would still be more sure I existed than that God existed. God cannot then
expect me to approve. Since Hell is supposed to be opposition to the love of God
it follows that I have to approve of God but reject him to go there. If I
shouldn’t approve then only an evil God would approve of a system like eternal
damnation. The doctrine implies that goodness is hating the self and rebelling
against it and trying to destroy it.
I would need to be a very holy person before I could claim the right to believe
that bad people go to Hell. It is just like you cannot judge your neighbour as a
whore even if she is worse than you if you occasionally sell yourself for sex.
There would be an obvious element of vindictiveness in doing that. Just imagine
the level of vindictiveness and evil there would have to be in you to judge
somebody as being in danger of Hell? And Christianity is all about making this
judgment for if you don’t see people as in danger of Hell you will end up
letting them go there. Better to upset them now and give them a chance to save
themselves than to let them go to the place of everlasting torment.
The Church says we should try to save people from Hell by expressing the gospel
to them. But if they deserve it why should we care? To save somebody from what
they deserve or have asked for is to declare that their decision to deserve
should no longer be respected and so their personhood shouldn't be respected. It
is to say that deserving doesn't matter and therefore that morality which is
based on the ideas of justice and deserving is nonsense. If we should save
people who deserve Hell from what they deserve, then we should fight every step
of the way to stop criminals being fined and or going to jail for they do less
damage.
Contradictions contradictions galore in the Christian faith! The help of
Christians then is sour. They give you rotten meat and marinate it in perfume to
disguise the stink.
2) Because it implies that God and the saints cannot want you to be released
from Hell for God keeps you there for you would leave eventually if you were
there of your own free will which glorifies hatred. You don't have to leave to
go to a Heaven. Why not an earth style setup? They don’t want you to leave
then they either do not care about you or they hate you but since they are happy
they must simply not care for hate is painful. But indifference is worse than
hate and is the real opposite of love. Also, they have to decide to be
indifferent and that is an act of easy hate so hate and indifference are
connected. If you should hate the damned you should hate the living sinners as
much because many of the damned are people who committed relatively harmless
sins.
3) Because you need a vast pile of evidence before you can say anybody deserves
to rot in Hell forever for that is such a serious punishment. The evidence would
need to be better than the evidence that John F Kennedy was shot. The case for Islam
and Christianity which both believe in Hell is not that strong – and
non-existent from a philosophical point of view. To say that God even if he is
all-good which we cannot be totally sure of has the right to damn people forever
is to make nonsense of all we know of right and wrong for you need to know why
he does it and prove that that his reason is plausible but no explanation is
possible. If God can be good and do that then he can be good and command the
murder of heretics. It is a serious slander to say that anybody could be that
bad that they would choose an eternity of misery. God must do something to the
damned to make sure they don’t repent. He must cut off good influences from
them. All that whitewash about people going to Hell against the will of poor
helpless God is nonsense and is so common and obviously ridiculous that it casts
doubt on the integrity of Christian teachers.
4) Because if God needs a Hell for a purpose then that purpose has to do with us
not him for he is all-powerful, in other words, we make it impossible for Hell
to be done without. But in that case he can create an illusionary prison for us.
Say we deserve perpetual agony surely he can do something to stop us
seeing it as painful as it is? It would
not be lying for he has no choice. He supports lies by not refuting them on
earth so he can promote what is not true.
5) Catholics say that Protestants who hold that Catholics are going to Hell are
bigots and being very uncharitable. Very isn't the right word. They are being
totally uncharitable. If that is bigotry, then what is it to look upon a dying
person and think they might or probably will go to Hell? The Catholics actually
admit - albeit indirectly - that Hell is a vindictive doctrine.
6) Because Hell, and the teaching that Hell exists, is useless for it cannot
deter us from sin.
Though it may scare us off doing bad things it does not stop us from having the
attitude that if there were no Hell we would go ahead and do the bad actions. In
other words, it fails to stop attachment and the will to commit sin. Such
attachment is sinful.
7) Because the modern attempts to justify Hell hold that the souls there are not
being tormented as much as possible but according to their sins. But they would
have to be tormented to the extreme for all sin is equal if there is a God. To
offend a God who deserves infinite kindness from you is an infinite insult. It
is not the tormenting in Hell that is most terrible but the forever aspect and
so why would a God who damns forever not torment you to the extreme forever? If
he gets scrupulous then he should close Hell down altogether. If you hate
God enough to choose eternal exclusion from him then that is such a
big sin that terrible punishment will come. If your other sins
are punished to different degrees you will not even notice.
8) Because the doctrines of venial sin and salvation from sin enforce the hatred
that emerges from the Hell doctrine. To say you have venial sin for which you
don’t deserve to go to Hell is the height of self-righteousness because you
intended to offer God an infinite insult knowing how much he hates sin and then
you say other people deserve Hell for doing much the same thing and that they
should be there if God wills. The if God wills clause implies that if God can
damn them without damaging his plan he should damn them. If you believe that
Jesus has saved you so that you will get away with your sins and other people
will pay for theirs for not being saved then it is your reasoning and your
feelings that tell you that. You are still being arrogant for it is not the
promise of God that you are depending on as you would like to boast but your own
thinking and feeling – your self-made perception. Since God says one error in a
prophets teaching is enough to prove he was from Satan (Deuteronomy 18) it
follows that to have real faith in Jesus you have to have a photographic memory
and a complete knowledge of theology, Christian history and philosophy. So
nearly all Christians can’t know if they are really saved and they are just
hoping they are and that those who disagree with them will rot in Hell forever.
There is no philosophical evidence in favour of the Christian faith so its
wishful thinking at its cruellest and when a person chooses to hope that the
damned will suffer eternally as well as that the just will have eternal life
instead of hoping that everybody will be saved one day it gives a real insight
into the dark nature of that person.
9) Because it is blasphemous to say that God would send anybody to Hell forever
without having evidence that he does. And even if it is to please the likes of
Jesus Christ it is still blasphemy. The less evidence one has, the worse the
blasphemy. And the Church claims to have strong evidence and still it expects
the people to do with very little. It’s an evil faith that does such a thing!
It is insulting and slanderous to say that a man murdered his baby for a good
reason without evidence. If God comes first then you need absolutely perfect
evidence and proof that God sends people to Hell for he is so important. You
need more evidence for him doing this than you would for the guilt of the man.
10) Because when evil is just mistaking what is not good for good how can
anybody possibly commit a sin that deserves Hell? Hell has no good in it at all
and we are expected to believe that a person could be so evil that they would
choose it. The Church explains that it is indeed the ultimate in insanity to
choose Hell but the damned choose to be insane. But then if you are insane you
need treatment not punishment and certainly not everlasting punishing from which
there is no escape.
11) Because the Atheist system shows that all evildoing is caused by fear. Hell
is therefore an evil doctrine for it incites fear for yourself and fear for
others going there. The Hell doctrine is designed to corrupt and suck people
into the pits of Hell and to say Hell exists amounts to saying, “I hate your
guts!”
We end by saying that arguing that God is bigger than our evil
does not fit the doctrine of eternal Hell and religion goes out of
its way to endorse the latter. And it turns forgiveness
something that should be spontaneous into a command. It
affirms Jesus who threatened people who don't forgive. No real
forgiveness happens under threats or pressure or commands. One
wonders does the spite of Hell arise from how even Christian
forgiveness is in principle toxic. Nobody has the right to say
somebody would stay in Hell forever or that anybody is bad enough to
sin to deserve it.