WHY IT IS BAD TO BELIEVE IN GOD
Harmful religion can be compared to the smoker. Most people feel that if you
want to smoke that is up to you. But what they object to is having to pay taxes
for your medical care and suffering the other consequences of your habit. They
do not want to be passive smokers over you. In the same way, unbelievers argue
that they don't want to be passive "believers" or passive religionists either.
Religion often has an innate bullying nature. Unbelievers have to be defensive
in the face of religion rather than aggressive for religion will usurp all the
rights it can at their expense. For example, unbelievers are forced to pray in
many public schools. If it is bad to believe in God, then we must work for the
secularisation of our society.
God is the supreme being who has power without limit and who is infinitely loving. God
is believed to have made all things and to be the one that keeps things running.
This belief is bad for countless reasons. A few are listed below.
* If God is not going to take away your cancer and
nobody can then can you accept his will? Not if the eastern religions are to be
believed. They hold that you can put your awareness outside of time and space.
In theory, that can be done and even if there is a God a person’s mind can
simulate an eternity of pure peace without God. Eastern mystics say they
know it can be done for they experience it. If they are right then God is
a doctrine that takes away people's chance to find transcendence.
* Self-deception is the most dangerous of human traits. People underestimate how
much they do it. It is too easy. Encouraging belief in God is bad because
religion causes the worst form of self-deception. Moses and Jesus and Mohammad
for instance blinded their followers to the evil of sentencing adulterous people
to death by stoning. Yet their dangerous faiths prevail in the world.
Catholicism likes to claim that it is not against reason but merely fills the
gaps for there are many things reason cannot tell us. In other words, it does
away with the reality check. Satanism or some new religion could do the same
thing. So we end up not knowing if the religion is true or not and are left
unable to know! Then we are left being cruelly expected to serve and sacrifice
for a faith that really has no credibility.
* Self-esteem is when you see yourself as a good and decent person who deserves
good things. It involves seeing yourself as self-made. The notion of God
encourages people to put themselves down. Religious believers may suffer from an
inferiority complex. To compensate for the horrible feelings they have towards
themselves, they may develop a superiority complex. If you feel weak and
helpless, you can over-compensate by telling yourself how God is on your side
and how powerful your prayers to him are. A person may develop a superiority
complex with regard to driving. Because they think they can do nothing right,
they may think that they are exceptional drivers and feel invincible. They
exaggerate how good they are at driving. But they will learn the truth the hard
way. Religion gives people God and people fall for the bait because religion
insulates the doctrine of God against the reality. For example, the believer is
told that if prayer seems to fail it actually is working despite appearances.
The superiority complex in religion is mistaken by society and psychiatry as
acceptable and makes believers often seem normal and ordinary. The truth is
actually very different and very disturbing. They are still ill. Abraham felt
his faith was invincible when he was going to murder his son as a sacrifice at
God's behest. This was his superiority complex at work. Yet he also felt he
didn't deserve his son - that was the inferiority complex at work. Abraham's
faith like all faith in God is based on arrogance - he claims to be an expert on
knowing what God wants. He knows too when God answers prayer even though it is
obvious that God is not answering prayer at all. Faith is arrogance enrobed as
humility.
* A child or immature person sees rejection where no rejection was intended. For
example, it is easy for a child to imagine that her mother favours her the least
of the children. If belief in God is inculcated in the child, the child will see
the seeming uselessness of prayer or failure of prayer or a feeling of
despondency or spiritual angst as a rejection by God. This increases the risk of
such thoughts as, "I don't know how anybody could love me." Such thoughts are
about warning yourself about others so that you must try to protect yourself
from rejection and the pain it brings. The thoughts are protective. Such
thoughts indicate that there is severe hurt there owing to a rejection or
perceived rejection by God or other people. And if it is true that evil
disproves God, it follows that if the child perceives rejection by God this is
simply a realisation that there is no excuse for God claiming to love the child
while tolerating that child being severely hurt. The blame then lies with the
Church and with parents who encourage faith in God or belief in the existence of
God. A perceived or real rejection by God should be far more damaging than any
other kind. After all God is the one who calls all things into existence. If he
cannot be trusted then nothing can and no one can. After all he even makes the
people who love us so imagine how bad it is to face divine rejection or to
perceive that God rejects you.
* You need to feel you are dependent on yourself to make yourself reasonably
happy. There are things that will happen that you have little or no control
over. But you are dependent on yourself to be able to face up to them. Take
charge of your own life and do not feel that God controls all things or that you
are dependant on him or anybody. Remember that free will does not solve the God
problem. Do not say, "God has given me free will and that means I am
independent." That is merely contradicting yourself. We would be free because
God lets us be and enables us to be. We are still as unfree as budgies put into
bigger cages. The owner still has all the control he wants over the birds. But
it is worse than that. Religion says that we are free because of God and not in
spite of him. Our freedom is wholly dependent on God. Without God you cannot
choose. Your battery has power but gets it from another power. So its power is
not really its power. Your freedom then is not your freedom. But to be really
free it has to be yours and yours alone. If you cannot move your arm and you
want to murder and somebody else moves the arm for you your freedom is dependent
on them but is not your freedom at all. Religion will answer that we are talking
about the will and nobody else can choose something for you and only you can
choose. It says the will is different and not like somebody moving your arm for
you. But the will is itself an action and so is moving the arm. God moving your
will is the same as God moving your arm. Unless atheism is true, there can be no
free will. The Church accuses people of abusing their freedom when in fact it is
freedom in name only. Freedom means you make your freedom yourself. You make
your own freedom. You cause your free will. Religion says God gives you free
will but in fact it is only using words. It does not really believe in free
will. Freedom would be a contradiction if there is a God. We are unfreely free
and freely unfree. Our independence is itself dependence. Feeling really
independent is fundamentally atheistic. So feel that. Failing to feel that it is
up to you shows you think deep down that your life is safer if you let others
take responsibility for you and the world. You do not feel you can make yourself
feel safe or that you can trust yourself. You like to think you trust God for
that is a diversion from the truth that you do not trust yourself to co-operate
with others implying your trust in them is far too weak. You are trying to
protect yourself from rejection by others and from feeling that you are really
useless. It is not really about God. It can never be. It is about you.
* Telling a child you think he is great and that you love him is a waste of time
unless it is a reminder to him of the good things you did and unless you look
lovingly at him. Then it is not the words that bring him joy but the actions the
words remind him of. The words are nothing at all without the actions and
memories of being cared for. A child can be damaged by telling him to centre on
the love God has for him and to put God first. God cannot give him the personal
touch that another human being can. A child cannot hear God telling him with
deep feeling that he loves him. What if you encourage your child to love God and
revere God? All you are doing is distorting the child's development into a
person who has the potential to be content and fulfilled. Love the sinner and
hate the sin will make less sense to a child than it will an adult. Hating the
sin will be equated with hating the sinner. Children are told to believe they
are sinners. The children will then fear God withdrawing his love which can
develop their capacity to block love messages from others. It is training the
children in becoming sceptical about the love others have towards them. A child
should be raised to be open to her own lovability and value and worth not God's.
The child that is into God is unable to face her or his sense of worthlessness
and deals with it by distracting herself from it. She concentrates on God
instead. But the problems are still there and the mask will slip. To be open to
your own value enables you to embrace and seize every moment you have as if it
were your very last moment. You are getting meaning in life from just living and
not for God or any other reason. You even live as if you will be dead in a
moment and going out of existence permanently. Life gives its own meaning and
gets it far more when there is awareness that death is the end.
* Thoughts in themselves are not going to change your negative attitude into a
more positive one. It is the feelings that do that. It is true that some
feelings will be accompanied by certain thoughts and vice versa. But it does not
follow that the feelings are the cause of the thoughts or that the thoughts are
the cause of the feelings. When feelings matter and are so fundamental then God
clearly cannot matter as much as them. Yet God by definition must be the only
thing that matters. God is goodness and if you do not see his full worth you are
in some way bad or a failure. But this contradicts the fact that feelings come
first. Feelings are proof that atheism may not be accepted but should be
accepted.
* It is mature to do what I do because I want to do it and not because other
people approve. The God concept implies that I should do what I do because God
is good and wants me to do it. It makes me worry about what God thinks. God
therefore is opposed to self-esteem and maturity.
I should know myself what good is and I shouldn't and wouldn’t need a God to
command me. You are only good when you follow commands you know are good. When I
have to judge God good before I can be good in obeying him, it follows that I
should do good because I see it as good in the first place. I shouldn’t be doing
it to obey him but because it is good. The God belief opposes this attitude. The
attitude makes the belief unnecessary and God is claimed to be wholly necessary
as a belief.
God shouldn’t be commanding me so what I do against other people shouldn’t
concern God and should concern his church even less.
* It follows from this that it is none of God’s business what I do to others. I
must try to do my best for myself and others and do it because it is my concern
and I want to do it. He has no business forgiving my sins against other people.
If I hit a child I hurt the child not him. If it is God’s business then my needs
and wants do not matter and I should be forced by religion to submit to it’s
credo. To delight in the mercy of God is to delight in degradation and we must
make ourselves feel that for feelings are contagious.
* God believers crave approval. We rarely get the approval we need from others.
And when we do, it soon bores us or it does not last. God believers then project
that there is a God who approves them and tell themselves that he exists. It is
about their desire for approval and not about God. They are really religious
atheists!
* Rather than say evil is a mystery (when no justification exists for God
allowing evil to happen, religion resorts to the cop-out that it is a mystery)
when God can stop it but won’t, it is better to say that an impersonal
intelligence not a God created all things and set a good but not all-powerful
entity over the universe. That avoids the mystery. It is callous to create
mysteries in such an important matter as human suffering for not understanding
creates more misery. The Church will reply that then you don’t have the
consolation of a God who will make all things right in the end. But even if
there is a God there is no guarantee that everything will be okay for me and
you. The Church says that God does not make it all right in the end for some are
confined to Hell to suffer forever. And besides the intelligence has done its
best. What kind of person would refuse to see some evil, such as a baby
suffering unimaginable horrors, as the intolerable thing it is in order to
assert that God will make it all okay in the end? You would need to see the end
result to justify it when it is so serious for the baby.
*There is a cruel streak in anybody who would condone a God standing by and
allowing dreadful suffering to happen and who makes diseases and killer viruses
and who damns many to an eternity in the torment of Hell. If somebody abuses a
child you don’t try to condone it. If you do, you are just a sweet monster. If
you can condone the things God does you can condone anything. God is only a
belief. Do you see how awful it is to create a belief and then insult people
with it? Do you see that though people see this as harmless that it is still
fanaticism? Fanaticism is just fanaticism. When fanaticism doesn’t lead to
violence it still could. If I am a harmless fanatic I can hardly complain if
somebody decides to adopt a fanaticism that gives them a bloodlust.
* God by definition does not need our love or our service for he is perfect and
almighty and so is perfectly happy. So he makes us suffer for the sake of virtue
he does not need and which we will not need in Heaven for there are no tears or
death there. Any good our actions do on earth could have been done by God
himself. But I need to feel that my good works for him are needed. Atheism not
theism is what makes us more eager to do good for it holds that good makes a
real difference. Theism demands good that is nothing but wasting time thanks to
God and it is anything but encouraging. Would you like to have a cleaning job in
which the employer deliberately dirties the place in order to give you something
to do? The God concept was set up as a soul-destroying enterprise that vibrates
with distaste towards human happiness.