Selflessness as a principle turns contentment/happiness into a sin
Selflessness or altruism says we must be about other people and their wellbeing
and not our own. We only care for ourselves so we can help others.
Incidentally believers say we should worry about serving and pleasing God not
our wellbeing so that is an additional demand put on the altruist. If God
becomes man as in Jesus it follows that Jesus should be cared for even while the
rest of the world suffers and needs our help.
Altruism says that we should not work for our personal happiness but if we are
self-sacrificing we will be happy as a side effect. The happiness comes from
nature and the way we are made and by itself. We didn’t evoke it or create it.
We will be happy because there is goodness in us to give. We will not be happy
that we are good for that is self-satisfaction for it would not be loving in
altruist terms to enjoy the fact that you are good to others. It is like the
difference in a person being glad to get a miraculous gift of brains and a
person who is glad that he has become a brain-box by his own effort. The
altruist who does altruistic good so that the side effect will come is working
for happiness and is a hypocrite not an altruist. Altruism says that working
directly for and indirectly for happiness is immoral. Happiness must be immoral
or a necessary evil. With necessary evils, you endure them and tolerate them but
you don’t want them and would like them to be unnecessary and vanish.
Altruism says that working directly for and indirectly for happiness is immoral.
Happiness must be immoral or a necessary evil. With necessary evils, you endure
them and tolerate them but you don’t want them and would like them to be
unnecessary and vanish.
If happiness should not be sought even indirectly, then happiness must be evil.
It is no answer to say that the altruist will be happier with altruism than if
he works for his own happiness. In other words, we are being told that altruism
does not condemn happiness but gives it like nothing else can. The true altruist
will not enjoy it for love is sacrifice. Happiness is given to be sacrificed if
altruism is true. Also, if you work for your own happiness you can manage to be
very happy and be happier than an altruist who represses it would be.
If the altruist who has just gone out of his way to do some great deed dropped
dead and there was no life after death altruism would still say that he did
right to be an altruist even if he did not believe in an afterlife or in a
reward and even if he knew he was about to die. This person did good for its own
sake and it did him no good so it is clear that his good did not matter to him
or to those who bless him for what he did either. Altruism is uncaring. When you
have to be altruistic even if you know you are going to die tonight and deny
yourself the most precious time you have left why shouldn’t you starve yourself
into hospital in order to feed somebody else who does not need any help from
you? Altruism requires that you have no thought for your own happiness.
The person who believes there is no life after death or who is not sure at all
or not very sure if he does believe is still expected to do selfless things that
bring him no benefit. His life is the most important thing he has and he could
be dead in five minutes and he still has to do that. This shows that it is still
wrong for him to be selfish and enjoy himself meaning it must be always wrong.
When he is old and has not many days left he is still expected to do it so then
how much more will he be expected to do it when he is young and healthy and has
no fear of dying? How much more will you and I be expected to do it when we are
young. Death implies that egoism is totally and always immoral once it is
accepted that altruism is a good thing.
Is it true that altruism has the side effect of happiness? Suppose it does. Then
it only results in happiness if it is not practiced properly. The true altruists
would work so hard that they would have no time to feel it. Happiness is meant
to be a potential side effect and not an actual one. When believe in altruism
and do a small thing for another person like giving away your last Rolo you are
saying that you are not worth that Rolo but somebody else is. If you do not
believe in altruism, it is different. You are giving it away because you honour
yourself as good.
Altruists sometimes claim that they feel happy because of their goodness. If you
can be altruistic, then you can be altruistic and still end up with depression.
You can do something great for somebody and feel nothing. If happiness comes it
does not follow that the altruism is the cause.
Altruism says that greedy selfish people in business who just care about making
more money cannot be really happy. But some of them are. The appeal of gaining
more riches would soon lose its shine if the altruists were being truthful. The
business people are evidence that they are liars.
We have seen that if altruism or selfless is good then we should not will or
allow anything that is done for our own sake. To find yourself happy and to
accept that happiness is the same as doing something to make yourself happy for
it is an act of will or acceptance so it is forbidden.
If my employer refuses to pay me for a month’s work I am forcing him to do wrong
if I insist I should be paid. But if I tell him it is okay if he does not want
to pay I am making him do right. If I am a real altruist, I will not make him do
wrong. So it is my duty to let other people walk over me.
What if I have a child to support? Since virtue comes first and I would rather
help my child than my employer it follows that I should neglect the child for it
is better to hurt myself by hurting the child in this way than to cause immoral
intent. I have taken the responsibility for this state of affairs from my boss
and put it on myself. I could argue that if I developed myself right I would not
be hurt so if I feel hurt it is my fault. I could say my child will not starve
and needs to learn through hardship.
I cannot say I should sometimes put the welfare of others before my own. I have
to do this all the time. If it is right to watch my maths when I am accounting I
cannot turn around and say I can be right some of the time. I have to be right
all the time.
Suppose I risk getting kneecapped to save a person terrorists are planning to
beat up to a pulp. The moral systems tell me I should even if I am sure I will
be kneecapped sooner or later because of it. They admire me giving my health
away so another even one who is less deserving can be blessed with health.
When I was a Christian I used to be devastated and very hurt when I saw people
sinning because I believed that sin results in eternal damnation. This was far
more damaging than what a person familiar with violence in the home would have
to put up with. If harming others is wrong then it can be wrong to upset their
feelings. If it is wrong to hit me then it is wrong to upset me by putting
yourself in danger of Hell. But what if I am upset just as much by altruists?
What if I find their altruism unnatural and offensive and want them to be
egoists instead? Altruists claim they have to go on with their work no matter
how much it upsets others. I find altruism very upsetting and soul-destroying
and don’t like to see it practiced. Altruism just cares about rules not
happiness. It also leaves you wide open to manipulation by people who say they
will be very hurt if you do x, y or z.