THE PAPAL AUTHORITY TO CHOOSE BISHOPS
The Roman Catholic Church claims that the popes have ruled the Church since
Jesus made Peter the first pope. History shows that the Church is lying.
Anyway, as the bishops are the successors of the apostles in Catholic theology
and the priests are not but their assistants it stands to reason that the pope
picks bishops.
For the first millennium, and well into the second, the popes never claimed that
they had the authority to choose bishops (Thomas Bokenkotter, A Concise History
of the Catholic Church, page 134). Had they been heads of the Church, their main
job would have been to conserve the faith by having a say in who would be
consecrated bishop and choosing the right one. There was a danger of heretics
being chosen and the Church being corrupted. The modern popes see their choosing
of bishops as the most important part of being pope and it follows that if the
pope is the head of the Church any bishop he has not chosen is illegitimate for
the pope cannot run the Church unless he uses the bishops as his eyes, hands and
feet. When candidates for ordination to the priesthood were just tested if they
knew the basics of the faith for a few days and then ordained (page 153) there
had to have been loads of priests and therefore bishops who did not understand
their religion and so who would have preached heresy. Their allegiance to the
Church might have been based on what they though the Church was and on what it
taught and they might have broken away or lost their faith if they found their
perception was wrong.
The Church and the papacy forbade usury (page 162). This tradition has been
forgotten though the Church says tradition is infallible truth.
Gregory VII following Pope Gelasius held that even people who are not Christians
are obliged to obey the princes of the Church for spiritual authority comes
before the state (page 124). Gregory VII was the first pope to say that
the pope cannot be judged by any earthly power - not even the Roman Emperor.
Depending on your view, you can say that is what being pope means. It is
very clear in a way that Vicar of Christ or anything that can be taken as a mere
claim to primacy but not absolute religious power is not.
Boniface VIII decreed in Unam Sanctum that no earthly power had the right to
judge the pope (page 187).
If the papacy is not to rule over the whole world then these men were heretics
and not real popes. Watch out then!
The Church teaches that the head of the Church in a diocese is the bishop who is
subject to the pope making the pope the ultimate head. If the pope is really the
head of the Church, why was the authority and right to choose bishops not
granted to him until the fourteenth century? (page 308, Can We Save the Catholic
Church? Hans Kung, William Collins, London, 2013). Only the head of the Church
can appoint subordinate heads. Remember, the priests are not heads of their
parishes - they administer the authority of the bishop.
CONCLUSION
The papacy is a late development in the Church and is not supernatural in
origin. It is not supported by the Bible and is a blight on the world with many
of its evil policies. To argue that the Catholic Church is the true Church
because it is led by Peter’s successor is simplistic. Yet it is the kind of
thinking that the Catholic Church deceptively fosters in the naïve.
APPENDIX - COMMENT POSTED IN 2018
Catholic doctrine about the pope being the vicar of Christ and head on earth
of the Church contradicts history for only later in history did the bishop of
Rome imagine he was boss and spiritual father of all Christians. The doctrine of
the papacy is immoral for it argues the pope has the keys of the sacraments and
can block the whole Church from forgiving sins or performing marriages - any
attempt will be invalid. Relativism starts with lying about history and that is
what the papacy is doing. History does not support Catholic doctrine and the
orthodox never recognised the pope. Most Christians do not. Indirect and
subtle catalysts for relativism are the worst. Relativism solidifies which
is why appropriate action is never taken over papal lies.
BOOKS CONSULTED
A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Thomas Bokenkotter, Image Books, New
York, 1979
A HANDBOOK ON THE PAPACY, William Shaw Kerr, Marshall Morgan & Scott, London,
1962
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS CATHOLICS ARE ASKING, Tony Coffey, Harvest House
Publishers, Oregon ,2006
A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST, Dave Hunt Harvest House Eugene Oregon 1994
ALL ONE BODY – WHY DON’T WE AGREE? Erwin W Lutzer, Tyndale, Illinois, 1989
ANTICHRIST IS HE HERE OR IS HE TO COME? Protestant Truth Society, London
APOLOGIA PRO VITA SUA, John Henry Newman (Cardinal), Everyman’s Library,
London/New York, 1955
BELIEVING IN GOD, PJ McGrath, Millington Books in Association with Wolfhound,
Dublin, 1995
BURNING TRUTHS, Basil Morahan, Western People Printing, Ballina, 1993
CATHOLICISM AND CHRISTIANITY, Cecil John Cadoux, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1928
CATHOLICISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM, Karl Keating, Ignatius Press, San Francisco,
1988
DAWN OR TWILIGHT? HM Carson, IVP, Leicester, 1976
DIFFICULTIES, Mgr Ronald Knox and Sir Arnold Lunn, Eyre & Spottiswoode, London,
1958
ENCOUNTERS OF THE FOURTH KIND, Dr RJ Hymers, Bible Voice, Inc, Van Nuys, CA,
1976
FROM ROME TO CHRIST, J Ward, Irish Church Missions, Dublin
FUTURIST OR HISTORICIST? Basil C Mowll, Protestant Truth Society, London
GOD’S WORD, FINAL, INFALLIBLE AND FOREVER, Floyd McElveen, Gospel Truth
Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI, 1985
HANDBOOK TO THE CONTROVERSY WITH ROME, Karl Von Hase, Vols 1 and 2, The
Religious Tract Society, London, 1906
HANS KUNG HIS WORK AND HIS WAY, Hermann Haring and Karl-Josef Kuschel,
Fount-Collins, London, 1979
HERESIES AND HOW TO AVOID THEM, Editors Ben Quash and Michael Ward, SPCK,
London, 2007
HITLER’S POPE, THE SECRET HISTORY OF PIUS XII, John Cornwell, Viking, London,
LONDON 1999
HOW SURE ARE THE FOUNDATIONS? Colin Badger, Wayside Press, Canada
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Martin R De Haan II, Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids,
Michigan, 1986
INFALLIBILITY IN THE CHURCH, Patrick Crowley, CTS, London, 1982
INFALLIBLE? Hans Kung, Collins, London, 1980
IS THE PAPACY PREDICTED BY ST PAUL? Bishop Christopher Wordsworth, The Harrison
Trust, Kent, 1985
LECTURES AND REPLIES, Thomas Carr, Archbishop of Melbourne, Melbourne, 1907
NO LIONS IN THE HIERARCHY, Fr Joseph Dunn, Columba Press, Dublin, 1994
PETER AND THE OTHERS, Rev FH Kinch MA, Nelson & Knox Ltd, Townhall Street,
Belfast
POPE FICTION, Patrick Madrid, Basilica Press, San Diego California 1999
PUTTING AWAY CHILDISH THINGS, Uta Ranke-Heinemann, HarperCollins, San Francisco,
1994
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London, 1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Editor Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom College Press, Virginia,
1982
ROMAN CATHOLIC CLAIMS, Charles Gore MA, Longmans, London, 1894
ROMAN CATHOLIC OBJECTIONS ANSWERED, Rev H O Lindsay, John T Drought Ltd, Dublin
ROMAN CATHOLICISM, Lorraine Boettner, Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing
Company, Phillipsburg, NJ, 1962
SECRETS OF ROMANISM, Joseph Zacchello, Loizeaux Brothers, New Jersey, 1984
ST PETER AND ROME, J B S, Irish Church Missions, Dublin
THE CHURCH AND INFALLIBILITY, B C Butler, The Catholic Book Club, London,
undated
THE EARLY CHURCH, Henry Chadwick, Pelican, Middlesex, 1987
THE HISTORY OF CHRISTIANITY, LION BOOKS, Herts, 1977
THE LATE GREAT PLANET EARTH, Hal Lindsay, Lakeland, London, 1974
THE LION CONCISE BOOK OF CHRISTIAN THOUGHT, Tony Lane, Lion, Herts, 1986
THE PAPACY IN PROPHECY! Christadelphian Press, West Beach S A, 1986
THE PAPACY ITS HISTORY AND DOGMAS, Leopold D E Smith, Protestant Truth Society,
London
THE PETRINE CLAIMS OF ROME, Canon JE Oulton DD, John T Drought Ltd, Dublin
THE PRIMITIVE FAITH AND ROMAN CATHOLIC DEVELOPMENTS, Rev John A Gregg, BD, APCK,
Dublin, 1928
THE SHE-POPE, Peter Stanford, William Hienemann, Random House, London, 1998
THE VATICAN PAPERS, Nino Lo Bello, New English Library, Sevenoaks, Kent, 1982
TRADITIONAL DOCTRINES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH EXAMINED, Rev CCJ Butlin,
Protestant Truth Society, London
VICARS OF CHRIST, Peter de Rosa, Corgi, London, 1993
WAS PETER THE FIRST POPE? J Bredin, Evangelical Protestant Society, Belfast
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO HEAVEN?, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1988
THE WEB
Pope John Paul II condemned as an immoral and traitorous and heretical pope
www.trosch.org
Of Bones and Boners: St Peter at the Vatican, Frank R. Zindler ,
www.atheists.org/church/bones.html
Has Rome Become the Seat of the Antichrist? Br Michael Diamond OSB
http://catalog.com/endtimes/diamond.html
This page claims that prophecies about the Vatican apostatising have come true
and that the pope, John Paul II is a fake and a heretic. It reports on evidence
from Masons and Communists that they had a plan to subvert the Church from
within and had placed spies and impostors in the Church. Pope John Paul II was
the first pope not to take the standard oath to defend the traditions of the
Church and the canon laws and to excommunicate anyone who threatened the faith
of the Church. That shows that there is more to this heretic than meets the eye
and he is famous for allowing fake Catholics to function within the Church.
Padre Pio who was famous for seeing the future snubbed Karol Wojtyla, he who
would become John Paul II. It is said too that John Paul II having stated that
religious freedom is lawful is contradicting Leo XIII who said that once you
give men the right to believe whatever they will you give them the right to
refuse to believe in loving God and remove all restraint on crime. It has been
noticed too that the pope claims that Muslims worship the same God as Christians
though the Muslim God said that anybody who believes in a three in one God is as
impure as dung. In 1986 the pope let ash that was a sign of devotion to the
Hindu god Shiva be placed on his forehead. In Assisi 1986 the pope invited
devil-worshipping animists to pray with him there for peace. The psalm says that
the gods of the pagans are all evil or demons (95:5). And there have been
similar meetings since, ones in Warsaw and Bari for instance. Another fault is
that Cardinal Ratzinger, the pope’s right hand man, has stated that the
resurrection of Jesus is not a historical event the way the crucifixion of Jesus
is. The 1917 Code of Canon Law states that if the pope becomes a heretic he is
no longer pope. Even the autocratic Innocent III stated that a pope who becomes
a heretic is to be cast out and ignored.