YOU SAY RELIGION LEADS TO WAR BUT FAITH IN GOD CAN DO IT ON ITS OWN
Believers say that God does not just represent and endorse morality but he is
morality. He is justice, for example. Interestingly, nobody praises Stalin for
serving justice in his perverted way. Nobody says, "Justice is God and Stalin
then was just serving his hazy and confused version of God." Indeed if God is
justice then you can say even secular wars are fought in the name of God even if
that is misguided. If they think they are fair they are trying to connect to
God. You can still blame God. You cannot blame secularism. God by definition is
the be all and end all.
Belief in God is a terrible thing. In Islamic countries in particular it is
responsible for many murders legal and otherwise. People are killed because it
is claimed that God has decreed that they must be punished by a cruel death -
often by stoning. Some believers will respond that it is not belief in God that
does this but men looking for power. The Bible God and the Muslim God wants
adulterous people subjected to cruel capital punishment. Men could get power
without stoning adulterous people to death. And do we have the right to say
those killers are just after power? Why not take them at their word - that they
do it out of a sense of duty to obey God? Accusing them of being godless
hypocrites who are really only interested in power is a guess. You need proof to
say that and you cannot get such proof unless you can do the impossible and see
into their hearts. Imagine the damage you do if you are wrong! You enable the
problem. You just judge the evil servants of God instead of judging the real
problem which is belief in God. The belief in God - God is by definition that
which is to be obeyed - is to blame. If God is such a great belief then how are
people able to use this belief to wreak great evil? Accusing them of being
hypocrites who are pretending to care about God is antagonising and angering
them far more - especially if they really do care for God.
Those who say, "Belief in God does not always lead to terrible deeds" need to
learn how to think. They too enable the problem of god inspired violence. What
you do is check to see if more people kill because they believe in God or if
more people kill if they don't. It is a statistical matter. If more kill because
they believe then you cannot hide behind the excuse that the belief can be
harmless.
People are being urged and conditioned to try to love God more than their own
lives. That automatically says that beliefs and religious authority come before
life. It is a short step then to start believing in books like the Koran and the
Bible that say we may kill for God and to start obeying them. To love God
entirely is to hate disobedience to him. The step from hating disobedience to
him to hating the disobedient is too short for comfort. Belief in God certainly
encourages violence even if it pretends to forbid it for it puts the temptation
to violence in those foolish enough to believe. When the religionists say they
kill because God commanded it then why not believe them? It is better for the
whole belief to be abandoned if that is what it takes to save as much as one
human life. Religion devoted to God denies this for it says that God as the
originator of life comes first and that is why I attack and abhor the fanaticism
it stands for. They are fanatics because they should have beliefs that are so
respectful of human life that no harm is done if their religions are false.
Happily there is hope. God does not exist and we should not want him to.
Christianity when it seems to be a religion of peace is actually a religion of
deferred violence. The violence is given to the Hebrews to do for them. For
example, consider how the Church regards the laws commanding the Hebrews to
stone people to death as divinely inspired.
When you believe in a God who uses evil to do good or if you think that evil is
necessary for real good to take place then you are saying it is reasonable to
believe that God can command you to go to war for him. Even if you are not
violent, you are still to blame for the believers that are for you and they both
cut the key to open the door of violence. If there is a God it is reasonable
that you may have to do harm for him but you will deny the harm is really evil
in the scheme of things. If there is no God and you believe in him, you are
making it reasonable for you to believe you may have to harm for him. Do not
enable damaging beliefs and behaviour - you could promote healthy beliefs and
behaviours instead.
If a person is conditioned to believe that killing people of other religions is
not seriously wrong or not wrong at all or even good you need incredible
evidence before you can trust that person in society. Conditioning is very
powerful and can seem to be gone and then resurrect itself unexpectedly. The
person themselves could end up surprised at what they want to do and do. The
seeds of violence were planted in the child and seeds can grow when the person
himself least expects it.
Religion opens the door to violence and censorship and indoctrination and abuse and pious fraud. It both opens the door and leads to them. A religion that leads some not all to such things is still bad. A good religion opens the door to no evil and does not lead to any evil.
Saying anything is an abuse of religion can be used in an ideological way and become a strategy for disrespecting and attacking religious freedom. You can say it is an abuse of Catholicism not to let priests break the seal of confession to stop murders. Or you can say it is an abuse of Catholicism to ban abortion. Or to ban atheists from becoming pope. Atheists would not want to but you never know. Stranger things have happened. It is thus in a faith’s best interest to admit that it, at least in some unknown way, leads to hate and violence.
Only the fruits of a bad religion show if it is implicitly or manipulatively endorsing evil. Only they show if it has an inherent knack for doing this.