PASCAL'S WAGER OR PASCAL'S BLACKMAIL?
Look at Pascal's Wager. Pascal argued that we must believe in God and his Church for there is no harm done if they are the truth and we will be in trouble and exposed as harmful people if we refuse to believe or don't believe. It gets worse. The eternal punishment of Hell is what he is thinking of as part of that trouble. Those who fail to love God supposedly go there forever.
It speaks to the individual. But also
to groupings. People are going to end up blackmailed by their
religious organisation.
You are forbidden to argue like Pascal did, "I will follow God's Church in case
it is true. If it is false I will be virtuous because I obeyed. If it is true
and I don't obey, then I will go to Hell forever. So it is safer to follow the
Church." That totally contradicts the insistence of Jesus and his mad apostles
that you put ifs and buts out of your head. For you, the Church and Jesus are
the truth. Period. This shows how the faith is about control over minds and
lives.
The Catholic and Christian religion uses Pascal's argument to get followers for
it ditches honesty and consistency when it wants to get new victims. But what is
it but mere fire insurance against Hell? It thrives on religious fear. It boosts
that fear.
The Bible says that perfect love of God casts out all fear. This teaching is
attractive in the light of Bertrand Russell's assertion that fear is the parent
of cruelty.
But love implies fearing that the object of your love may not be respected by
you and others. Love and fear go together. Love requires that you fear failing
to love properly.
The believer in God must partly fear that God may not exist and so the love
given to God is wasted. You cannot say, "But it is good for people to love even
if what they love is false." That makes no sense. Nobody encourages you to love
what you think a person is rather than what the person really is. It is a
contradiction to say that it is good for a person to love something no matter
what it is even if it is bad or doesn't exist. If God does not exist, you cannot
encourage a person to love him more than their child. They should love the child
more. The person cheats themselves and their child.
And even if you have no fear of God, he gives you plenty of other things to
worry about. The Bible says that not all will be saved and go to Heaven. Some
will spend eternity in the torment of Hell. It is better to be afraid of God
than to have to worry about something so hideous.
The Bible teaching about perfect love casting out fear is simply a lie. You will
only end up fearing you are doing something wrong when you realise that despite
your love of God you are still suffering from fear. The teaching is not helpful
at all.
If you think Hell is entirely your own creation and God is passive in all that,
then you will fear yourself.
If you admit that the Bible says God is not passive but ruins your body and soul
in Gehenna or Hell as Jesus said in Matthew 5:22 then you will have as much fear
as ever. The notion of God being passive in relation to Hell contradicts the
Catholic doctrine that God raises the bodies of those who will suffer in Hell so
that they will suffer body and soul. Then you will still fear yourself for it is
because of your rejection of God that he sends you to Hell.
Religious fear is the fear that leads Catholic to fear the Protestant and Mormon
and Muslim to name a few.
It is the fear that makes Catholic families disinherit and cast off sons or
daughters who leave the Church.
It is the fear that makes Catholics vent hatred towards priests who forsake
their "vocation" and get married.
It is the fear that is used to bully and frighten and put pressure on women to
avoid getting pregnant out of marriage.
It is the fear of giving a "bad example that draws to sin and Hell" that leads
parents to rip the babies from the arms of their unwed daughters and have the
babies sent off to adoptive parents to keep the "scandalous" knowledge of the
births from the neighbours and the rest of the family.
It is the fear that leads a Catholic father to beat up his son or daughter for
doubting the religion or failing to go to Mass or getting drunk or whatever -
all of which Rome considers to be serious sins that deserve everlasting torment.
All Pascal's argument produces is hardship and hypocrisy because it has people
living in fear and only doing good and obeying to avoid Hell. The good person
does good for it is good. Doing it to avoid Hell means you are not doing good
for it is good but to avoid torment. It is begrudged good. Yet the Church approves
of this good for it says God will forgive you in confession through the priest
even if you are only repentant of sin for the sake of avoiding Hell!
Unmarried mothers and gay people, to take two examples, who support the Church
by being classed a member, by going to Mass or by giving financial support to
the Church are betraying themselves and other unmarried mothers and other gay
people. One day the Church could have the power to make unmarried motherhood and
being gay the horrific shame it was able to make it in the past. And indeed in
many parts of the world it has that power. Morality changes with the fashions.
As long as the Church condemns something, it could get into a position in the
future where it can persecute and suppress those who flout its condemnation.
What a fine preparation for death Christianity is! When you feel death coming
upon you, you are naturally going to accept the Wager as correct and applicable.
It will be irresistible. After all who wants to go to the everlasting
imprisonment of Hell especially when it could be only a few minutes away. But
rejecting sin to avoid punishment is in reality not rejecting the sin at all but
the punishment. It means that because of your Christian faith, you go out of
this world hating punishment and wishing you could sin all you want without the
fear of it hanging over you. It's a no-win situation. You are damned if you do
repent and damned if you don't. And yet the Church says that you will be damned
unless your preference is for God rather than sin. What is it doing? Trying to
put people in Hell?
The Church teaches that we should believe in it and its message for it means we
will be virtuous and will have that advantage even if the faith it teaches is
untrue. That is really insinuating that outsiders and naturalists and humanists
and atheists are evil people or promoting evil. They are working against virtue
and should not be allowed to do that. They should especially be kept away from
children in case they become a bad influence.
Fear percolates though the mind and body of the person. It easily spreads
to the next person. Fear shows us how dangerous Christianity is.
BOOKS CONSULTED
A CATECHISM OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE, CTS, London, 1985
A HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 6, PART II, KANT, Frederick Copleston SJ,
Doubleday/Image, New York 1964
AQUINAS, FC Copleston, Penguin Books, London, 1991
BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL, Friedrich Nietzsche, Penguin, London, 1990
BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER, Association for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge,
Dublin, 1960
CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, Veritas, London, 1995
CHARITY, MEDITATIONS FOR A MONTH, Richard F Clarke SJ, Catholic Truth Society,
London, 1973
CHRISTIANITY FOR THE TOUGH-MINDED, Edited by John Warwick Montgomery, Bethany
Fellowship, Minnesota, 1973
CRISIS OF MORAL AUTHORITY, Don Cupitt, SCM Press, London, 1995
EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT, VOL 1, Josh McDowell, Alpha, Scripture Press
Foundation, Bucks, 1995
ECUMENICAL JIHAD, Peter Kreeft, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1996
GOD IS NOT GREAT, THE CASE AGAINST RELIGION, Christopher Hitchens, Atlantic
Books, London, 2007
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri,
Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
HANDBOOK OF CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS, Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli, Monarch,
East Sussex, 1995
HONEST TO GOD, John AT Robinson, SCM, London, 1963
HOW DOES GOD LOVE ME? Radio Bible Class, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1986
IN DEFENCE OF THE FAITH, Dave Hunt, Harvest House, Eugene, Oregon, 1996
MADAME GUYON, MARTYR OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, Phyllis Thompson, Hodder & Stoughton,
London, 1986
MORAL PHILOSOPHY, Joseph Rickaby SJ, Stonyhurst Philosophy Series, Longmans
Green and Co, London, 1912
NEW COLOUR PIETA, Divine Mercy Publications, Skerries, Co Dublin, 1994
OXFORD DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY, Simon Blackburn, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 1996
PRACTICAL ETHICS, Peter Singer, Cambridge University Press, England, 1994
PSYCHOLOGY, George A Miller, Penguin, London, 1991
RADIO REPLIES, 1, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1938
RADIO REPLIES, 2, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1940
RADIO REPLIES, 3, Frs Rumble & Carty, Radio Replies Press, St Paul, Minnesota,
1942
REASON AND BELIEF, Brand Blanschard, George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1974
REASONS FOR HOPE, Ed Jeffrey A Mirus, Christendom College Press, Virginia, 1982
THE ATONEMENT: MYSTERY OF RECONCILIATION, Kevin McNamara, Archbishop of Dublin,
Veritas, Dublin, 1987
SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD, Jonathan Edwards, Sword of the Lord,
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, undated
THE BIBLE TELLS US SO, R B Kuiper, The Banner of Truth Trust, Edinburgh, 1978
THE BRIEF OF ST ANTHONY OF PADUA (Vol 44, No 4)
THE GREAT MEANS OF SALVATION AND OF PERFECTION, St Alphonsus De Ligouri,
Redemptorist Fathers, Brooklyn, 1988
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST, Thomas A Kempis, Translated by Ronald Knox and Michael
Oakley, Universe, Burns & Oates, London, 1963
THE LIFE OF ALL LIVING, Fulton J Sheen, Image Books, New York, 1979
THE NEW WALK, Captain Reginald Wallis, The Christian Press, Pembridge Villas,
England, undated
THE PRACTICE OF THE PRESENCE OF GOD, Brother Lawrence, Hodder & Stoughton,
London, 1981
THE PROBLEM OF PAIN, CS Lewis, Fontana, London, 1972
THE PUZZLE OF GOD, Peter Vardy, Collins, London, 1990
THE SATANIC BIBLE, Anton Szandor LaVey, Avon Books, New York, 1969
THE SPIRITUAL GUIDE, Michael Molinos, Christian Books, Gardiner Maine, 1982
THE STUDENT’S CATHOLIC DOCTRINE, Rev Charles Hart BA, Burns & Oates, London,
1961
UNBLIND FAITH, Michael J Langford, SCM, London, 1982